The Orphanage (2008)
Facts
| Directed by | Juan Antonio Bayona |
| Cast | Belén Rueda, Fernando Cayo, Roger Príncep, Mabel Rivera, Montserrat Carulla and Geraldine Chaplin |
| Theatrical Release | January 11, 2008 |
| DVD Release | April 22, 2008 |
| Running Time | 105 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | R (Restricted) |
| UPC Code | 794043120718 |
| Buy this item | $19.99 at Amazon.com As of Sep 5 22:30 EDT (details) 1 DVD, Warner Brothers, Usually ships in 24 hours, Color, Dolby, DVD-Video, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC Languages: Spanish (Original Language - Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround), English (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled) Or 55 new from $10.00, 32 used from $7.16 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for The Orphanage posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| Digs Its Own Grave |
1. Why wasn't the orphanage swarming with police and investigators after it was determined that Simon was missing? Any normal missing child situation would involve a more fervent and exhaustive effort to find the child. Laura and Carlos don't seem to try very hard and they are never investigated as suspects in their own son's disappearance, as any other parents would be. Although the police are contacted, it appears to have been done merely as a formality. This is a typical example of movie characters acting in ways that only make sense in the movie.
2. If Benigna murdered the children and then went into the shed with a shovel to try to hide the bodies (or perhaps move them), why did she come to the house and pose as a social worker in the first place? Why did she have old paperwork related to Simon? Where did she get it?
3. When Laura discovered Benigna in the shed, why didn't she catch up with her and question her? Why didn't she go immediately back into the shed to try to find out what Benigna was doing there? If she had done this, perhaps she would have found the bodies of the children sooner. Any normal person, upon finding a stranger snooping around on his/her property, would make more of an effort to find out why.
4. When Laura finds Simon, he is alive. Then she tries to move him and his body turns to dust and she discovers that he is dead on the floor dressed in Tomas's (the deformed, murdered boy's) clothes and hood. She carries his corpse upstairs and then he suddenly comes back to life, and all of the children come back to life, and apparently Laura decides to stay forever in "ghost world" to take care of them. The final scene depicts Carlos placing flowers on a gravestone that reads "In memory of all of the children and Laura", or something like that, so it is assumed that Laura is dead. Huh? This ending had me scratching my head. How did Laura "die"? Was Simon ever alive after she found him, or did she just imagine him to be? Why is Carlos, Mr. Skeptic, shown to be actually accepting the loss of both his son and his wife, smiling amusedly while standing in the empty orphanage, putting flowers on the grave, etc? This just didn't make sense to me.
Although some of the issues that I have brought up in this review may seem to be minor inconsistencies to some people, I cannot completely suspend logic and reason in order to accept the reality that a film presents. A great horror film has to be scary without having the characters behave in ways that are alien to normal, everyday behavior just to make the story make sense. This film has too many gray areas that don't add up. The viewer is asked to ignore the nonsensical nature of the plot, but I can only do so much ignoring before I lose interest. August 31, 2008
| Fantastic |
| We are the product of our surroundings |
| very good, very scary |
| If you want a Horror This is NOT IT!!! |
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





