The Sickhouse (2007)
Facts
| Cast | Gina Philips and Stuart Brennan |
| Theatrical Release | November 30, 2006 |
| DVD Release | March 18, 2008 |
| Running Time | 90 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | Unrated |
| UPC Code | 794043113536 |
| Buy this item | $17.99 at Amazon.com As of Oct 8 4:46 EDT (details) 1 DVD, Warner Brothers, Usually ships in 24 hours, AC-3, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DVD-Video, Full Screen, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language), English (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled) Or 43 new from $8.45, 27 used from $4.75 |
About The Sickhouse
While excavating the site of a 17th century plague hospital ?archaeologist Anna (Gina Philips) accidentally unleashes the malevolent spirit ?of a?plague?doctor responsible for a series of gruesome murders 350 years earlier?and ?he?s ready to practice again! Trapped inside the hospital with four ?trespassing teens and hunted by the murderous spirit Anna must find a way for ?the living to escape the building before history repeats itself and one by one ?they become permanent patients.Running Time: 129 min.Format: DVD MOVIE Genre: HORROR/HAUNTED HOUSE UPC: 794043113536 Manufacturer No: 1000037052 Product Description
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for The Sickhouse posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| I feel sick |
The visuals are exactly what I've been looking for in a horror movie, and they are really where the feeling of filth comes from. The colors are drab, the lighting is unnaturally bleak and the camera work is reminiscent of a nightmare. The shaky-cam technique doesn't always work out to the film's advantage, but for the most part, it's used quite well. The ghosts are pretty good, but I think their presence could have used some more obviating instead of them just showing up every once in a while. The atmosphere is icky, but it's not creepy. The entire movie is pretty well devoid of horrifying moments. You'll probably be grossed out, not scared.
The acting is pretty good. You may think that acting in a horror movie doesn't require any talent, but try looking scared while you run from what you know is just a guy in a suit, a puppet or empty space to be edited with CG later. Then try doing it all day and you'll have an idea of what it takes to film an entire flick. The characters were all believable, and even though they weren't as well fleshed out or deep as some may like, they weren't simple plot bots. That role seemed well filled by the ghosts, whose motives were pretty much unknown until the last few minutes, and even then it's sketchy at best.
Not all is well with the movie, however. The editing sucked. There are times where the film moved way too slowly, and the aforementioned shaky cam view sometimes made it unnecessarily difficult to follow what was going on. The movie's worst offense was the map. Every once in a while, it comes out of the movie to show you where the next scene will be on a map of the complex. It's cheesy, ugly, stupid and gives off a horrible "Uwe Boll" stench. The director would do well to learn from this mistake.
All in all, it was a good horror movie. If the director can capitalize on his ability to perturb and mix it with real horror, he may bring us a true horror classic. Until then, you can watch this and pretend you're scared. September 16, 2008
| Movie sucks eggs |
| Can somebody please make a true HORROR movie!! |
| Goes nowhere! |
| One of the worst ever made! |
This film seemed promising at the outset, but became more idiotic as each minute passed. The plot revolves around an attractive American archaeologist working solo on a dig in an old sanitorium in London. Her work is interrupted by a group of typically obnoxious British "teens" who are in the process of fleeing the scene of a hit-and-run accident. They soon discover that the building is haunted not only by the spirits of murdered children, but also by the powerful ghost of a "plague doctor". Fairly decent synopsis, yes? Unfortunately for this film, the synopsis is the only thing remotely interesting about it.
The film's dialogue is pedantic and predictable, the acting is atrocious, and the cinematography is reminiscent of a student film. I assume the director was going for a "realistic-yet-gothic" feel when shooting this movie. I won't spoil the ending for those of you who insist on watching it, but suffice it to say you'll know the ending before you get halfway through it.
Do yourself a favor and watch the original House on Haunted Hill if you want a good ghost movie. This one belongs in the bin, not on your shelf. May 16, 2008
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





