Flags of Our Fathers (2006)
Facts
|
Flags of Our Fathers (Full Screen Edition)
DVD Price: You save 13%! As of Oct 8 17:54 EDT (details)
|
| Directed by | Clint Eastwood |
| Cast | Ryan Phillippe, Jesse Bradford, Adam Beach, John Benjamin Hickey, John Slattery, Chris Bauer, Joseph Cross, Judith Ivey, Melanie Lynskey, Neal McDonough, Robert Patrick, Barry Pepper and Paul Walker |
| Theatrical Release | October 20, 2006 |
| DVD Release | February 6, 2007 |
| Running Time | 132 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | R (Restricted) |
| UPC Code | 097361235042 |
| Buy this item | $12.99 at Amazon.com As of Oct 8 17:54 EDT (details) 1 DVD, BEACH,ADAM, Usually ships in 24 hours, Color, Dolby, Full Screen, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language - Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround), French (Original Language - Dolby Digital 5.1), English (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled) Or 42 new from $1.99, 81 used from $0.80, 2 collectible from $19.99 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Flags of Our Fathers posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| Beautiful! |
| I cracked it |
| 2nd to Saving Private Ryan |
Bruce Bain you are defeating your purpose, you try to come across as some Intelectual Jarhead who is trying to educate the ignorant public. Well having said that you really portray yourself as some pompous leftwing narcissictic elitist scum of the earth that is probally in love with his so called writing abilities. Your message is so uncompelling and painful to read, you should try to be an editor for childrens books instead of dedicating your slimy fingers to contradict anyone and anything. Please quit hiding behind that you are or were a Marine, there are good and bad, smart and stupid, strong and weak, in every faction of society not excluding the Devil Dog society, you just happen to fall into the ladder category assuming you are who you say you are. But who cares? Probally just yourself, now go ahead and over analyze my comment and scrutinize every little character that I have written I will not be waiting for your egotistical response. Hooooahhhh!!!!!!!!!!
July 14, 2008
| Flags of Our Fathers |
| Worthy effort, scattershot result |
First of all, lets say, this is a film worth watching, with an interesting message, great cinematography and terrific acting. However, the decision to straddle two types of story weakens the stories impact, and the end result feels just a little too unfocussed to really work well.
The story follows 3 of the surviving men of the famous photo of raising the flag on Iwo Jima. The photo becomes an iconic image of victory, and the government seizes the opportunity to use the survivors to tour the US exhorting the public to buy War Bonds. To understand the film a little better, it is necessary to go in realizing that this is not a historical dramatization of the Battle of Iwo Jima in the traditional war movie sense, although scenes from that conflict are brutally realistically portrayed, in true post-Ryan terms. It really only shows those war scenes as scattered flashbacks of the veterans as they are paraded around America to help sell the war. In using the flashbacks to show the battle, we are being led to understand not what the moment of war itself is like, but how the memories of certain moments within a war can stay with you and haunt you, or in the case of Ira Hayes, drive you to drink. It's a different way of looking at the horror of war than we usually get - however the effect of that is weakened by layering another level of flashbacks to the same events, viewed as the son of one of the men interviews his fathers friends to find out more about what happened to him. It's an unnecessary complication which weakens the movie. A second theme is the obvious one about the role of propaganda - how the act of allowing a lie to sell the truth becomes its own form of corruption.
And so, we go bouncing between these two central ideas as we see how the 3 survivors react differently to their new found `fame'. The leads are all fine, and the cinematography as we have come to expect in an Eastwood movie is great - but the end result feels like it has just a little too much baggage to work efficiently - but flawed as it is, it is still worth a look.
June 29, 2008
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





