Frightmare (1975)
Facts
| Cast | Kim Butcher, Deborah Fairfax, Leo Genn, Noel Johnson, Sheila Keith, Rupert Davies and Andrew Sachs |
| Theatrical Release | June 30, 1975 |
| DVD Release | May 16, 2006 |
| Running Time | 83 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | R (Restricted) |
| UPC Code | 631595061598 |
| Buy this item | $17.99 at Amazon.com As of Sep 5 14:30 EDT (details) 1 DVD, Media Blasters, Usually ships in 24 hours, Color, DVD-Video, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language - Dolby Digital 1.0) Or 25 new from $9.00, 9 used from $5.96 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Frightmare posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| The Family That Kills Together Stays Together |
"Frightmare" asks the question: Can someone be cured of cannibalism? Of course not. Dorothy Yates underwent psychiatric treatment for cannibalism for fifteen years before being declared sane and released. Her totally devoted, spineless husband Edmond, who protected and abetted her in her crimes, was also released. With the help of Jackie, Edmond's daughter from his first marriage, the middle age couple start a new life in a secluded farmhouse. Unfortunately, Dorothy isn't cured and begins luring victims to the farmhouse through her tarot card readings. Even worse, their baby daughter, Debbie, has grown into a young woman who has inherited her mother's propensity for violence.
"Frightmare" has everything I love in a well crafted horror movie: fast pacing, nail-biting suspense, terrifyingly gruesome scenes, and a good body count. Believe it or not, the gore was kept to a minimum. This film is far more entertaining than Pete Walker's earlier films such as "Die Screaming Marianne" and "The Flesh and Blood Show." It is highly recommended for fans of slasher flicks, cannibal movies, and/or Pete Walker. It deserves a strong five stars. Best scene: When Edmond learns where Dorothy has hidden the corpses.
August 12, 2008
| You Could Put An Eye Out!... |
| Borefest. |
It took me four tries to get to the end of this movie; I kept falling asleep. I'm pretty sure the only reason I soldiered on after the second time was to see whether it would get any more irredeemably awful than it already was. The worst part is I can't even say that about it; it just continues on with the baseline of badness it establishes at the beginning, never going anywhere that might make it interesting, even in the worst of ways.
The plot, what little of it there is, centers on Dorothy Yates (Sheila Keith, who would team up with Walker again a decade later for House of the Long Shadows), who was confined to an asylum for fifteen years. After she is released, she and her husband Edward (War and Peace's Rupert Davies in one of his final screen appearances) relocate to a small village on the coast to try and restart their lives. They get mysterious late-night visits from their daughter Jackie (character actress Deborah Fairfax in her only big-screen appearance), whose stepsister Debbie (House of Mortal Sin's Kim Butcher) is chafing with teenage rebellion at Jackie's draconian house rules. There's a lot of less-than-germane stuff about Debbie's rebellion and Jackie's boyfriend Graham (Paul Greenwood, the only one of the principals still working), a young, enthusiastic psychologist who's trying to understand the odd family dynamic. We get back round to the actual plot eventually, but we'd be deep into spoiler territory by the time we got there.
Not that there's a great deal to spoil. The big plot twist (Dorothy's crime) was revealed by most of the reviews at the time, and is common knowledge among those aware of the film, but I'll not reveal it here. But more to the point, by the time we get there, we just don't care any more. So much of this movie has so tenuous a connection to what's going on (and the connection we do get is really straining at its bonds) that we lose sight of the overarching plot within the first half-hour, and it's almost a surprise when Edward and Dorothy pop up; what have they got to do with thugs roaming the streets of London? Not a great deal, as it turns out. When we find out that most of that subplot was nothing more than window dressing aimed at getting one specific character into one specific place, the elaborate machinations of the script get too annoying for words. This one has faded into well-deserved obscurity, and you'd be well served to leave it there. *
July 18, 2008
| Under-appreciated Masterpiece |
| I have a Meegrane.....no wonder |
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





