Sweet November (2001)
Facts
| Directed by | Pat O'Connor |
| Cast | Keanu Reeves, Charlize Theron, Jason Isaacs, Greg Germann, Liam Aiken, Ray Baker, Lauren Graham, Robert Joy, Frank Langella and Michael Rosenbaum |
| Theatrical Release | February 16, 2001 |
| DVD Release | April 18, 2006 |
| Running Time | 120 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested) |
| UPC Code | 012569806146 |
| Buy this item ... | 1 new from $19.14, 1 used from $7.99 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Sweet November posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| This November is anything but sweet... |
`Sweet November' has the disadvantage of sporting a preposterous story that makes little to no sense and is chuck full of so many clichés one may can guess each and every plot point just by reading the film description. Sara Deever is a sweet single woman who engages in month-long relationships with men in order to help them change their lives for the better. She shies away from any real commitment because she is very ill and so she makes sure she warns them before agreeing to take them on that they are not allowed to fall in love with her, no matter what. Her `November' is Nelson Moss, an advertising executive who is a workaholic, devoid of any real life. After a chance meeting she decides to invite him to live with her so she can `help' him.
Yes, it's a ridiculous premise. No self respecting woman would invite total strangers to come live with them, and no sane male would take her up on the offer. He may go home for the night, but he's not moving in.
I understand that films don't always make sense; they are in fact works of fiction; and if the plot were the only issue I may be compelled to forgive it a little and enjoy what else I can from the film, but the plot is the least of its worries. There is a major problem with the two stars of this film, especially Reeves, but Theron does little to rectify the problem. Keanu Reeves is seriously one of the worst actors of our generation. He has almost no emotional depth and is almost always one-note. In fact the only role he seemed suited for and actually delivered in was `The Matrix', for it was the only role that required his dry personality. Here he falls flat and proves uninteresting and ridiculously mechanical. His performance is laughably bad, nothing honest coming from him in any way. Theron is better, but she can't rescue the film. She is charming but her quirkiness tends to be a drawback. Her character comes off as rather insane instead of interesting. She is gorgeous, there is no denying that, but pretty is not enough.
I honestly thought that this movie was going to be sweet, but I can't stress enough how deceiving the films title really is. I want to rent the original now, just to see if it is as horrible. Somehow I doubt that. I took my ex-girlfriend to see this film when it was first released, thinking that it would be a great date movie, but it proved to be a horrible experience for the both of us, and while I don't blame this movie for our eventual breakup (which happened less than a week later) I do find it slightly ironic and like to joke that this movie was our downfall. I recently caught this movie on Cable and sat through it, just to see if my feelings for the film were tainted by my feelings for my ex, and their not; the movie is genuinely horrendous.
If you want to see something romantic and charming this is not the route to go. Rent `Love Story' or `The Notebook' or `While You Were Sleeping' instead. May 9, 2008
| Oh please! No more Love stories ending with an uncurable disease! |
First, I would like to say, I love, love Charlize Theron as an actor, she is excellent, when placed in the right roles and her agent is not on some kind of "let's make a quick buck, fix!" But hey, she did make Mr. Reeves look good, okay not really.
But Keanu Reeves in a romances is like someone scratching their nails on a chalkboard, HUH! actually he is just an awfully, awful actor, it's like watching a robot trying to have emotions, especially in an romantic movie. Keanu is better in movies that does not require using the human heart to express emotions!
Now on to the Scenes in the Sweet November. I'm from SF and know for certain, at least I am 99.9% certain that you cannot walk out of your house in Potrero Hill and 5 minutes later be scrolling down Dolores Park, eating an ice cream cone, nor can you be in Chinatown with one skip and a hop from Potrero Hill. Unless you have a car or you have a very special route from Potrero to Dolores Park to Chinatown, in which case could someone please let me Know! Just had to mention this, because it really bugged me....
But hey, this is hollywood and I guess they figured us folks in the Bay Area would not catch this one.
Basically, if the acting on Keanu's part had been believable, heartfelt and real, I would have enjoyed this movie more. Plus, what is up with the Movies about dying woman, with some unknown disease! October 25, 2007
| Sweet november (not Spanish Subtitled) |
I really would like to know, for future purchases, that the movies listed were rated at all of their features, specifically of the languajes of their subtitles.
July 6, 2007
| I LOVE IT, THINK YOU WILL TOO! |
| Outstanding! |
Truly, as it is infamously told in the reviews, the last act of the film, to it's end was absolutly heartwrenching. I was just starstruck by Charlize Theron's character in this movie, her performance, everything. I also found that this is actually a REMAKE of the original from the 50's with Sandra Dee. I've yet to see it, but it peaked my interest. Although I doubt it would hold a candle to this version. I am now a starstruck fan of Theron's, and have since obsessively seen every one of her performances since. This is a MUST SEE. April 8, 2007
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





