Eavesdropper (2005)
Facts
| Directed by | Andrew Bakalar |
| Cast | Costas Mandylor |
| Theatrical Release | November 30, 2004 |
| DVD Release | January 24, 2006 |
| Running Time | 97 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | R (Restricted) |
| UPC Code | 031398167006 |
| Buy this item | $14.99 at Amazon.com As of Oct 11 16:16 EDT (details) 1 DVD, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP DISTRIBUTION, Usually ships in 24 hours, Color, DVD-Video, Full Screen, Subtitled, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language), Spanish (Subtitled) Or 24 new from $2.97, 31 used from $1.74 |
About Eavesdropper
Fifteen deaf patients take part in an experimental clinical trail aimed at hearing restoration and within days fourteen of the fifteen participants in the trial become violently psychotic ultimately taking their own lives to stop the violent side effects brought on by the treatment. Patient #14 - Liza Raines - is the sole survivor of the experiment; however the ordeal permanently alters her hearing resulting in Liza s new super-human ability to hear frequencies emitted by the brain when it thinks. When her life is suddenly thrown into jeopardy Liza is forced to use her new ability against those set on covering up the fact that she ever existed.Format: DVD MOVIE Genre: ACTION/ADVENTURE/THRILLERS Rating: R UPC: 602498844267 Manufacturer No: FM4426DVD Product Description
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Eavesdropper posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| A sleeper movie that I really liked |
| Original movie just keep in mind a few facts |
Right here, the first review mentions that the movie's web site says that the director is missing. This all looks creepy and quite interesting, so I just bother to speed the movie's end up to see a typical commentary that states what the movie is based on. In case you've never noticed such legend, it comes after mentioning the staff who made the movie, credits, filming places, and more. The statement is virtually at the very end of data displaying. I've always seen it in fiction movies making clear the movie is not real and any similarity with real life events is only coincidence. I guess they show it in order to avoid law suits and this movie does have that statement. I also guess the movie makers think that they can say whatever they want in their movies and it's up to people to pay attention to little details, like the typical small letters one finds in some contracts in life.
The movie making industry has been criticized by many Conservatives for being biased by siding too much with Liberal views. This movie is an open example and it actually hurts more than helping the Liberal causes by lying. The bad guys here are military staff, and at least one time the top bad (Aiden Porter) guy makes clear the Liberals are the menace when he asks Liza to spy on a Liberal judge to be appointed for the Supreme Court or something very high. I have seen other movies like this where they scare people without providing proper reasons; my favorite example is "The 7th day" I think, one of the last Arnold Shageswhatever's movies, which shows genetic engineering feeds the starving masses and saves endangered species (what is going to happen) but it must be stopped because the owners can be evil. If this is so, there should not human civilization in first place since everything out of human civilizations has had serous consequences, we'd better return to our old caves (although I see more consequences on that path).
Regarding the movie's story, it did not make much sense to me very often. In one scene, the typical waco scientist (Dr. Kramer I think) has his tongue cut off without anesthesia by Porter's men; however they let him go. Later on Dr. Kramer, with his mouth still bleeding, reaches Liza's to give her confidential documents.
Nevertheless, if you like movies like "Constant Garner" you may still like this movie. For example, Liza usually doesn't know well what's going on around her. Eventually, her survival is more about good luck than anything else. As for me, despite my critics I still enjoyed the movie because it reminded me of my childhood movies and cartoons where characters would get super powers out of secrets and accidental experiments -the sort of Spider-man or the X-Men which are still very popular- and the story sequence was still entertaining since it involved a lot of intrigue. Besides, the claim that it was all real (supported by the lack of any other high tech stuff, but traded by intrigue) made the movie more appealing. Just keep in mind it's all fake. May 15, 2006
| Fascinating |
| I hear you |
A well executed formula movie. At one time we were innovated by movies where a secret formula, or radiation, or LSD experiments create a superset of senses. And of course the experiment hast to be covered up. The main experimentee is usually more moral than the experimenter. Others, usually the government, want to use the abilities for their own nefarious purposes.
So the story is not unique however the acting and details are exceptionally good. You can tell that this is a pilot and it makes you wonder who will survive to make the program.
For sci-fi lovers you may recognize George Takei (Sulu on Star Trek), and John de Lancie (Q on Star Trek: Voyager), together again.
The only thing missing would be the mystique of a missing film maker. Shads of Aimee Semple McPherson.
February 17, 2006
| Really Good Movie |
Eavesdropper is an interested film compromised mostly of a C list cast, but its definitely worth checking out.
February 8, 2006
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





