Best of the Beatles (2005)
Facts
| Cast | Pete Best |
| Theatrical Release | August 30, 2005 |
| DVD Release | August 30, 2005 |
| Running Time | 120 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | NR (Not Rated) |
| UPC Code | 085365470422 |
| Buy this item | $12.99 at Amazon.com As of Oct 12 21:02 EDT (details) 1 DVD, Lightyear, Usually ships in 24 hours, Closed-captioned, Color, DVD-Video, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language) Or 37 new from $5.38, 12 used from $5.69, 1 collectible from $19.98 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Best of the Beatles posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| The Bestles |
| Best of the Beatles |
Overall, I thought this DVD was just ok. Pete revists some of the places in Hamburg...I found that interesting...yet I thought his book was better than this DVD. It just seemed all over the place and it didn't hold my attention but his book did.
I didnt get anything out of the "extra" hour.
However, Pete Best is a key component of early Beatle history and his tenure with them should not be overlooked. He added a great deal to their fame with his pounding bass drum and extremely good looks. I checked on youtube with the Silver Beatles when Ringo replaced Pete at the Cavern. You can clearly hear the audience yell at the end "We Want Pete" and you can hear John Lennon's voice says YES. This was in the book as well. I never thought John wanted Pete out, my guess it was Paul and maybe Brian since Brian propositoned Pete one night and Pete declined. Perhaps Pete would be too much of a temptation for him to work with him?
I asked myself after reading his book, would the Beatles ever have made it big if it were not for the Casbah? Perhaps they would not, and Mrs. Best was a key player in the Beatles destiny. You will see that if you order the book. July 17, 2007
| Pete Best's Anthology |
There are two things that make this essential viewing for hardcores. First, the presence of the earliest known footage of the Beatles performing (St. Paul's Presbyterian Church Hall, Birkenhead, 10 February 1962), and the impressive cast of lovers and friends from the Beatles' formative years who agreed to be interviewed including Astrid Kirchherr, Klaus Voormann, Jurgen Volmer, Brian Poole (of the Tremeloes), session drummer Andy White, Horst Fascher, Julia Baird Lennon, Cynthia Lennon, Gerry Marsden, Bill Harry, Decca's Mike Smith, producer Ron Richards, and most amazing of all, former Apple CEO, Neil Aspinall (the father of Pete's half-brother, Roag).
Time has not been kind to some of these faces. I was taken aback more than once by how their appearances starkly contrast with the iconic pictures we automatically conjure in our minds when we think of these people. Their comments, alas, are often perfunctory, reinforcing the Best agenda, rather than probing it.
This is, in essence, Pete Best's 'Anthology' - will you finally find out why Best was really fired from the Beatles? No. But you will find much to enjoy and refer back to. July 9, 2007
| Not bad. Not great either. |
But, the whole thing seemed amateurish to me, particularly the music. I'm guessing they couldn't use real Beatle music, but the stuff they did play was awful. Another major gripe - a number of the people interviewed were not identified.
I had to laugh at one statement (that they showed at least twice) - "you never saw the Beatles unless you saw them in Hamburg." I forget who said it (maybe one of the unidentified), but that's absurd. August 27, 2006
| Not "Best" Or Worst - Just Different |
Obviously, it's absurd to claim Best was a lousy drummer, or else he could never have soonafter helmed the Pete Best Combo, which recorded and toured for a few years in the mid-'60s. Likewise, Ringo was hardly lacking, given that he was first brought in as an outright ringer, hot off his duties with Rory Storm and the Hurricanes. Just listen to the two drum styles - Best is more of a jazz or pop drummer, while Ringo was more suited for the surf and rock 'n' roll style of the time.
The Beatles could have also gone in a jazz direction - who knows? But they didn't, since George Martin was then looking to develop a rock 'n' roll group. Had he wanted them to be a different sort of group, maybe they would have gone in that slightly altered direction instead. So we must realize in the end that fate - and finance - had the final say. February 3, 2006
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





