The Flowers of St Francis - Criterion Collection (1952)
Facts
|
The Flowers of St Francis - Criterion Collection
DVD Price: You save 10%! As of Oct 14 2:43 EDT (details)
|
| Directed by | Roberto Rossellini |
| Cast | Pino Locchi, Gianfranco Bellini, Arabella Lemaitre, Roberto Sorrentino, Aldo Fabrizi and Isabella Rossellini |
| Theatrical Release | October 6, 1952 |
| DVD Release | August 23, 2005 |
| Running Time | 87 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | Unrated |
| UPC Code | 037429208120 |
| Buy this item | $26.99 at Amazon.com As of Oct 14 2:43 EDT (details) 1 DVD, Criterion, Usually ships in 24 hours, Black & White, Closed-captioned, DVD-Video, Subtitled, NTSC Languages: English (Subtitled), Italian (Original Language - Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono) Or 38 new from $19.75, 16 used from $11.22 |
About The Flowers of St Francis - Criterion Collection
In a series of simple and joyous vignettes, director Roberto Rossellini and co-writer Federico Fellini lovingly convey the universal teachings#of humility, compassion, faith, and sacrifice#of the People#s Saint. Shot in a neorealist manner, with monks from the Nocere Inferiore monastery playing the roles of St. Francis and his disciples, The Flowers of St. Francis is a timeless and moving portrait of the search for spiritual enlightenment.
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for The Flowers of St Francis - Criterion Collection posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| Both funny and quietly touching |
| An authentic portrayal |
P.S. after writing this I read the other reviews. They make clear the range of possible reaction both on the human level and the artistic. I don't have any quarrel with (almost) any of them. I would just say that there is a great deal going on here regarding both the person and film, so if you are just getting acquainted with either aspect, look around a bit before making up your mind for yourself. November 15, 2007
| another fine criterion release |
| Historically Interesting But Only Mildly Entertaining |
Having seen "The Flowers of St. Francis," however, I do not feel as if I have any more insight into St. Francis's legacy than I did prior to the viewing. The film is structured as a series of vignettes--mostly sweet, idyllic, naive and/or comical. This was not a conventional narrative, so the entertainment that you derive from the film comes from how much you appreciate these stories. I found them innocuous enough, a couple were amusing--but ultimately I wished for more illumination.
Having studied Rossellini's intent behind "Flowers," I know it was a personal film for him. He wanted to show glimpses of St. Francis and hint at the appeal and ardor that his followers had. He consciously chose this narrative style to make simple "Franciscan" teaching moments. He was happy with the outcome, and that's why it's important in Rossellini's film oeuvre.
While the film might not be my cup of tea entertainment-wise, it is interesting to fit it into Rossellini's filmography--both as a personal statement and as an evolution of his style. I'll still take "Open City" anyday, but I don't dismiss "Flowers." KGHarris, 10/06.
October 15, 2006
| Unbelievable, in the worse sense of the word |
It does not cover the conversion of St. Francis, since it begins after the Pope has allowed him to found the order. It does not present what his principles were, other than to care for the poor. Poverty (his own) and simplicity are barely present, and then handled badly with unseemly inconsistencies. At one point, Francis even praises his own humility. That's not very humble as far as I'm concerned.
It would seem that Francis was actually quite an inspiration to his brethren, but in this film he is a stern, distant, unfeeling father figure. He gives commands which are frequently disobeyed without any remorse. Even though Francis himself is reputed to have run through the streets stark naked to show his disassociation from the material world, he is appalled at one of the brothers who gives away his cloak to the poor and returns shirtless.
Many films portray Jesus as a relatively distant person, withdrawn, often emotion-less and passive. Francis gets this kind of portrayal in this film. In fact, the only character to which one can relate is Brother Ginepro (forgive spelling please). The final scene emphasizes the treatment of Francis as Jesus in an over-obvious and almost silly allegory for "Go into all the world and preach the gospel" which in the Gospels was followed by Jesus' ascension. In reality, Francis knew he was a flawed, repentant sinner, saved by God's grace into a life of simple happiness and good works, not an error-free Christ-figure.
The setting is not redeeming. The brothers live in little stone huts, from which they emerge only on certain occasions, acting much like a bunch of chicks in a chicken yard. Though the Church calls the order "beggars", these beggars are more persistent and more obnoxious than any present-day street beggars. They seldom have anything to give to the poor, so they go out and badger reticent donors and then give only some of their receipts to the poor. Very much NOT what St. Francis was about.
The scene with the tyrant appears to have been dropped in from some other movie, and its point is far from clear. It is not at all apparent what it has to do with St. Francis and his teachings.
Though not a five-star movie in itself, Brother Sun, Sister Moon is a much better production than this. By comparison it is marvelous.
September 23, 2006
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





