Dracula 3 - Legacy (2004)

More horror-filled terror in the modern DRACULA series presented by Wes Craven, DRACULA III: LEGACY adds Rutger Hauer (CONFESSIONS OF A DANGEROUS MIND, THE HITCHER) to a hot returning cast starring Jason Scott Lee (THE JUNGLE BOOK), Jason London (GRIND, OUT COLD) and Roy Scheider (JAWS). The feared Dracula (Hauer) leads vampire hunters Father Uffizi (Lee) and Luke (London) back to eastern Europe and a country plagued by civil war. There they discover powerful local warlords are assisting Dracula by capturing victims and delivering them to feed the vampires residing in Dracula's castle! And to make matters worse, Father Uffizi must face his own temptations as he struggles to overcome the vampire virus within himself! With sizzling stars, a riveting story and stunning special effects, this suspense-filled thriller will satisfy anyone with a taste for terrifying entertainment!

To everything an end

The series wasn't particularely high quality, but for some reason one keeps watching until the end. And what a lovely ending it is.

I had the most trouble with the changing of actors during the three movies. Was it so hard to keep them or did they use them up during the process? Not a clue.

Perhaps I'm a bit spoiled, but I prefer grande productions in high quality such as the Bram Stoker's version. February 13, 2008

Why?

I really am leery of sequels, and this is the third installment of the dracula 2000 series. First of all, Dracula (Rutger Hauer) wasn't all that strong a character and it doens't really explain why they have changed his face for the third time. The one performance that I thought I liked was Scott Jason Lee and the ending. Don't expect alot from this, its only entertainment..But, if you are anything like me, I have the three installments....Still like the first the best...and again with the ending, will there be a forth? February 3, 2007

entertaining follow-up

More vampire mayhem from the folks who brought you Dracula 2000. Sequels often pale when compared to the first film, but 2 and 3 have their moments. I like them. Many of the ideas and characters are enjoyable. Could have been a little better. Could have been a lot worse. Pretty darn impressive for a direct to video sequel. Ultimatley it's a good time. Part 3 is a fine vampire movie worth watching - and owning. December 13, 2006

The worst movie ever !!!! One cannot even rate this piece of nothing !!!

Please be so wise and stay away from this absolut c..p movie !!!!

I'm Romanian and totally repulsed by this misery they want to consider a movie !!!

Movie makers have lost that little respect they once had !!!

A complete misery !!! Do not waste your money on this piece of c..p !!!
June 13, 2006

toothless

This was with out a doubt, the worst cheese flick I've ever seen.
I bought this video for the actors, but even Jason London and Jason scott, couldn't save this film. These dracula films keep changing the rules for what it takes to kill a vampire.
Jason scott lee, never recieved the reconition he deserves for his acting abilities. Therefore, he has settle for what ever films he can get. The film makers gave the impression Romania, had become a bleak and dismal emptiness, utterly wretched and unhappy place, nothing more then a desolate place for vampires on the loose. This film went from my dvd player into the garbage can. April 9, 2006

More reviews at Amazon.com ...