The Plague Dogs (1982)
Facts
| Cast | Christopher Benjamin, John Bennett, James Bolam, Tony Church, John Franklyn-Robbins, Judy Geeson, Nigel Hawthorne, Bernard Hepton, John Hurt, Rosemary Leach, Warren Mitchell, John Franklyn Robbins and Patrick Stewart |
| Theatrical Release | November 30, 1981 |
| DVD Release | August 17, 2004 |
| Running Time | 85 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested) |
| UPC Code | 692865128335 |
| Buy this item | $9.99 at Amazon.com As of Jul 5 6:59 EDT (details) 1 DVD, PEACE ARCH HOME ENTERTAINMENT, Usually ships in 24 hours, Color, DVD-Video, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language) Or 19 new from $2.82, 8 used from $2.99 |
About The Plague Dogs
Determined to escape the confines of an evil laboratory two dogs make a flight for freedom into the rugged hills. Panicked by the cries of other animals on their way out they accidentally break a vial used by plague researchers and when news gets out that the two could be infected the human world launches the deadliest hunt. Pursued at every turn the dogs are forced to retreat further and further until their time runs out and they must make the ultimate decision and take their chance with fate.System Requirements:Running Time 85 min.Format: DVD MOVIE Genre: ANIMATION/ADULT SWIM Rating: PG-13 UPC: 692865128335 Manufacturer No: T-1283 Product Description
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for The Plague Dogs posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| They don't make 'em like this any more |
The quality of the animation itself is not on par with Disney feature animation (nor I'm certain, was the budget) but it's not bad by any definition.
Like others have mentioned, the DVD is lacking any special features which is disappointing but I'm not going to to dock it a star for that because I bought it to see the movie and this is no 4 star film. I was happy it was even available on DVD. March 15, 2008
| Great Movie. |
| How did this get made? It is amazing! |
| An Animated Animal Movie with Bite |
Like it's predecessor "Watership Down" (another Richard Adams book made into an animated feature by director Martin Rosen), "Plague Dogs" is a very adult tale about animals in jeopardy. In "Watership..." it was a small group of rabbits in search of a safe home. "Plague Dogs" is the story of two dogs who escape from a testing laboratory. Together they are desperate to find safety and a life free of abuse and pain. The smaller dog (Snitter) having just had brain surgery, is a smart but tortured animal. Rowf, is a dog mentally and physically beaten by repeated drownings. Together they search for peace, but peace does not come easily on an empty stomach and the many pastures of sheep are too tempting for the two dogs to pass up. As sheep carcasses begin to pile up local farmers begin to make the connection that the testing laboratory may have had something to do with the two wild dogs that are roaming their land. When it's discovered that the laboratory was working with Bubonic plague, the dogs are marked for death.
Ultimately "Plague Dogs" is an adventure tale; however, director Martin Rosen uses the bleak storyline to propel a theme of hopelessness. Snitter and Rowf and undesirables, cast out by bad luck and bad timing. The society that they find themselves in is unable to fully understanding their situation and their destruction is a simply seen as a more effective way of dealing with them. The ending in particular has our two furry antagonists in questionable straights.
Such a film would not play well today, nor did it play that well in this country 25 years ago. It asks too many questions, pushes too many cringe inducing buttons, and often doesn't wait for the passive viewer to catch up. I can't think of one reason why or how a movie like this got made, but it's our great fortune it did. "Watership Down" proves to be a better movie experience but "Plague Dogs" goes where "Watership Down" didn't and we are all the better for it.
May 31, 2007
| Worth seeking out the Australian version |
I actually just wanted to address a couple of points in a previous review (possible spoilers coming). The original film, released in the UK in 1982, was 1 hour 42 minutes - this is the full, unedited version which can ONLY be found on the Australian DVD release (the quality isn't great, but at least you're getting to see the whole film). The difference in running time (99 mins on DVD as against 102 mins in theaters) is simply down to the fact that films run slightly faster on VHS and DVD than they do on the big screen; ALL films are approximately 3 - 4% shorter when transfered to home entertainment formats.
When it came time to release the film in the USA, director Martin Rosen had great difficulty finding a distributor willing to take it on. That shouldn't come as too much of a surprise; the film is far too disturbing for kids or families, and adults are likely to dismiss an animated feature with talking animals as kids' stuff - so who exactly would pay to see this movie? In an effort to placate the distributors, Rosen was forced to cut 17 minutes from the film's running time. Some of the cuts were simply made to speed up the pace, and others were made to remove some of the more unpleasant scenes (most notably the sight of a human corpse which the starving, desperate dogs have partially eaten). Needless to say, these cuts did little to lighten the film's grim tone, and it only ever received a brief and extremely limited run at a few US theaters. Unfortunately, it is this shorter version that has been used for most of the recent DVD releases; as I mentioned before, only the Australian edition has both versions included.
There were some changes to the plot in the transfer from novel to screen. The somewhat forced but nevertheless welcome happy ending in the book was removed, to make the film a more powerful anti-vivisection statement. Also the fate of the fox, or The Tod as he is known, was changed; in the book he falls victim to a hunt, whereas in the film he sacrifices himself to a pack of army hounds as a distraction, allowing the two titular dogs to escape (temporarily) on a train. This was NOT changed due to any pressure from pro-hunting groups; neither Richard Admas or his admirers would have tolerated such a move. I imagine it was changed to allow the Tod's death to play a more important part in driving the plot forward, and to show us the wily fox was a noble fellow in the end. May 10, 2007





