Home   >   Movies   >   The Stan Laurel Collection

The Stan Laurel Collection (1924)

Facts

The Stan Laurel Collection (Slapstick Symposium)
DVD Price: $29.95 $26.99
You save 10%!
As of Dec 3 1:32 EST (details)

Buy from Amazon.co.ukBuy from Amazon.co.uk
Directed byStan Laurel, Clarence Hennecke, George Jeske, Harry Sweet and Joe Rock
CastStan Laurel, James Finlayson, Katherine Grant, Eddie Baker, George Rowe and Mary Kornman
Theatrical ReleaseAugust 3, 1924
DVD ReleaseAugust 3, 2004
Running Time357 minutes
MPAA RatingUnrated
UPC Code738329036522
Buy this item$26.99 at Amazon.com
As of Dec 3 1:32 EST (details)
2 DVD, Kino Video, Usually ships in 24 hours, DVD-Video, Silent, NTSC
Languages: English (Original Language)
Or 20 new from $20.75, 7 used from $18.24
 

Website Links

  • Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
  • IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
  • Art.com - Search for The Stan Laurel Collection posters.

Similar Movies

The Stan Laurel Collection 2
The Stan Laurel Collection 2
The Oliver Hardy Collection
The Oliver Hardy Collection
The Charley Chase Collection, Vol. 1
The Charley Chase Collection, Vol. 1
The Charley Chase Collection, Vol. 2
The Charley Chase Collection, Vol. 2
Three\'s a Crowd
Three's a Crowd

 

User Reviews

Average user review: 4.0 (9 reviews)

rating: 5 QuoteStan's preLaurel & Hardy daysQuote
He was no match for his former acting school roomate Charlie Chaplin,but Stan did a pretty good job on his own,prior to teaming up with Oliver Hardy.This DVD set is worth viewing.There are many memorable shorts.James Finlayson appears in many of them.Including one of my favourites,Roughest Africa.Pete the Dog,of Little Rascals fame even appears in Dr.Pyckle And Mr.Pride and a few others.The last film in this set,Yes Yes Nanette,was directed by Stan,but he does not appaer in it.James Finlayson and Oliver Hardy are the stars of this film. March 17, 2007

rating: 4 QuoteEverything is funny, but Stan.Quote
You'd have to go pretty far to find a more devoted Laurel and Hardy fan than I, but as I watched this great collection I realized that Stan wound up exactly where he belonged, behind the camera. The gags are funny, but they could have been done by any other able bodied comedian of the time. He HAD no character, and that is precisely the problem. I still gave this set 4 stars because the prints are gorgeous, the films are fun, and they are definitely worth preserving (KINO does an amazing job). My only negative comment has to do with Stan himself...who, if he wanted to continue as a performer, really needed Ollie a lot more than I'd realized. As for Ollie, well, he more than likely would have continued as a wonderful comic supporting character actor, just as Eugene Pallete did (another Roach veteran). October 27, 2005

rating: 4 QuoteSolo StanQuote
Before he became Oliver Hardy's partner in 1927, Stan Laurel had starred in and directed many films on his own. This set has several good films on it. Some of the best are : The Soilers, Stan plays a prospector in Alaska. Oranges and Lemons, Stan plays a fruit picker and causes mayhem. Postage Due, in which Stan causes mayhem by just mailing a letter. Roughest Africa, where Laurel is a professor on an African Safari, and manages to anger some wildlife. Several of the films feature James Finlayson as a nemeis to Stan. Fin would play similar roles in several Laurel and Hardy films. As as been noted, Stan had a hard time finding a character that worked for him during his solo career. But I recommed getting this set to see a comic legend in development. And the prints used are in excellent shape. August 22, 2005

rating: 4 QuoteA great comic in transition.Quote
1923 to 1925 to Stan Laurel was a period of transition for one of the greatest comedians/gag men of 20th century film.
Starting out with one foot still firmly planted on the vaudeville stages of the United States and Canada Stan Laurels' films of this period made first for film producers Hal Roach,then Joe Rock then back to Roach would see him in the end stay in the film medium for good.
Watching these films reveals a comedian of the first order.He displays his skills with an ease and aplomb that equalled or excelled Chapln,Keaton and Lloyd.And there certainly were very few who could equal his mastery of the gag which he is responsible for throughout most of these films.
Most of these films have been previousy released on video and DVD but these transfers are for the most part quite superior to anythng I've seen before.They are for the most part quite crisp and clear which make them a joy to watch and own.
This Stan Laurel is not the Stan of Laurel and Hardy(which was less than two years away) but in these films are definite signs of the future persona that the public would come to know and love.
And this was unfortunately the crux of the question of why Stan didn't become a "hit" before his future teaming with Oliver Hardy.He didn't have a standout "hook" or persona that grabbed the publics' attention like Keaton or Chaplin had.
This ultmately caused Stan to move from in front of the camera to behind it where he was quite happy to write and direct until fate kindly brought he and screen veteran Oliver Hardy together in front of the camera where the two would go on to make film history as the greatest film comedy team of all time.
The Stan Laurel Collection is essential film history.I recommend this two disc set very highy. February 2, 2005

rating: 4 QuoteFun but missing somethingQuote
I've been a Laurel and Hardy fan since July of 1996, when I was sixteen years old, and was delighted to find this collection of Stan's earlier solo work, esp. since he's always been my fave of the two (his character is so endearing and easy to relate to). Still, there just feels like something missing without his partner. There are quite a number of funny moments, but overall they're just not as laughter-inducing as when he and Ollie were together. I agree that part of the reason is because, while brilliantly-written and acted, Stan just hadn't developed into the character he later became. In most of these shorts he plays the well-meaning kind-hearted simpleton we know and love, but that character isn't as developed or concrete as it is in the Laurel and Hardy shorts. I like him because the character he played onscreen is so easy to relate to and like, but that persona just isn't there to relate to in some of the shorts, however well-crafted, and when it is there, it just isn't as constant, well-honed, and perfected as it was later to become. Still, on the whole these are really enjoyable shorts, only I wouldn't recommend them to a new fan. December 2, 2004

More reviews at Amazon.com ...