Blind Chance (1982)
Facts
| Directed by | Krzysztof Kieslowski |
| Cast | Boguslaw Linda, Tadeusz Lomnicki, Zbigniew Zapasiewicz, Boguslawa Pawelec, Marzena Trybala and Jerzy Stuhr |
| Theatrical Release | November 30, 1981 |
| DVD Release | August 17, 2004 |
| Running Time | 114 minutes |
| UPC Code | 738329035624 |
| Buy this item | $26.99 at Amazon.com As of Dec 3 1:29 EST (details) 1 DVD, Kino Video, Usually ships in 24 hours, Closed-captioned, Color, DVD-Video, Subtitled, NTSC Languages: English (Subtitled), Polish (Original Language) Or 25 new from $18.59, 8 used from $10.51 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Blind Chance posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| Good effort |
The problems with the film have to do with some direct comparisons with the Three Colors trilogy. From an artistic viewpoint, the film is rather drab looking, even though filmed in color, and while one might ascribe this to the fact that the film, divided into four sections- a prologue and three alternate versions of a small, minor event, takes place in a relentlessly grim cosmos, this does have a subliminal effect of negating the optimistic premises that arise within the plot. This leads, however, into the second major flaw in the film- the fact that Kieslowski is relentlessly politically preachy in this film, with several of his characters going off on long political sermons and tirades well before we, the audience, have any idea who this character is or why he or she is so angry about something. Yes, this tale took place in a Communist dictatorship, but that's not enough to excuse banal and propagandistic art- try enduring the pap art most Latin Americans proffer.
By the time Kieslowki made the Three Colors trilogy he learned that a film cannot exist merely for political critique. The critique has to be an organic part of the film, and while all three films in the trilogy have political messages, none are as blatantly propagandistic as this film's heavy-handed message is. The third major flaw with the film is its pacing and construction. The film starts off with its enigmatic lead character screaming, and the camera following down his craw, then switches to a jumble of scenes from his boyhood which, only later, gel, and then not totally. Among them are scenes of his father drilling him in math, a parting with a childhood Jewish friend named Daniel, an encounter with a family friend, and he and his brunet teen girlfriend Czuszka being ridiculed by passersby in a bus as they walk down a roadside. Then, as a medical student, a blond female student named Olga, who has a crush on him, winces when she sees her former teacher, whom she hated, being used as a laboratory corpse, and cut open. Then, his father dies, and his enigmatic final message is that his son is `under no obligations.' The film is a bit too frenetic and confused early on, even though this start does pay off in narrative twists later on in the film....Critics who cite this film as an example of the butterfly effect are wrong, however, and simply do not understand the philosophical concept. The butterfly effect is about how a specific action can affect future events, not how a series of non-actions- which are what most of the main plot turns on and ultimately what this film is about, affect things. Blind Chance is the inversion of the butterfly effect, not its exemplar, for this film is not about a specific future, but a trio of possible futures. Blind Chance is not a great film, but it is a good one, and superior to its imitators, as well a herald for the future greatness Kieslowski had in him.
For example, the great image in Red, where Valentine and Joseph's untenable love is symbolized by palms meeting across a car's windowpane, is foreshadowed on several occasions in this film, at train stations. There is also abundant symbolism and unique metaphor within, such as a shot, in the first life, of a slinky going down a staircase, then dying, much like Communism was; or in the third life, where two jugglers toss balls back and forth between them, which shows how Witek, who tries and fails to juggle three apples- as well as lives, must ultimately choose just one, and be stuck with it. Such terrific metaphors are the coming butterflies of the Three Colors trilogy, and through their wings the colors light allows would permit Kieslowski his filmic legacy, one which Blind Chance's failures lent inspiration to.
September 8, 2008
| Blind Chance |
| A work of genius on several levels |
In one scenario the man becomes a Communist party member, another an anticommunist, and yet in a third a good husband and doctor. The people from one reality are in the background of another, but because of the main course of action taken is different, they do not play a central role in the other time line. I found it absolutely fascinating to see how his lives play out and how he ends up at the same fate, regardless of which life he leads.
"Blind Chance" is an intellectual and psychological movie and may appeal to many people. I highly recommend it to anyone looking for a little more than just a regular story. It is a work of genius on several levels and not to be missed.
February 25, 2006
| Rigid structuralism |
While it is more than obvious that this is a truly innovative approach to filmmaking for its time, the filmmaker is far more interested in displaying this unconventional structure than he is in giving Witek--or basically any other character--any emotional depth. Witek makes his choices primarily based on what happens to him rather than making a decision; this is even true of what woman he decides to connect to. Three women are presented in the film, each representing one of the three paths Witek follows.
There is plenty of nude coupling in the film but all this sensuality does nothing to counterbalance the obvious dryness of the film because in no instance do we ever FEEL that Witek is involved in ANYTHING, even intimacy with these women--two of whom are married. In essence, Witek exists to carry out the premise of the film--that our lives are determined primarily by circumstances and not by the decisions we make. It is for this reason that Witek, in fact, IS so passive. He HAS to be that way to insure that the filmmaker's purpose is fulfilled.
It is intriguing to compare this to Tom Tykwer's Run Lola Run which, in my opinion, is a far more involving film. The reason for that is because Tykwer's characters are directly involved in what amounts to a life-or-death situation and the three different outcomes are all gripping because we want to find out if the characters will survive or not. Because of this, Tykwer's characters do everything they can, GIVEN the different circumstances in which they find themselves, to resolve their situation. In Blind Chance, Witek does next to nothing; he acts as a conduit for Kieslowski--both the filmmaker's rigid structuralism as well as his political leanings.
I give this three stars for its truly innovative structure. But this is not a film that grips the viewer. At least not this viewer. January 7, 2005
| Interesting and important film |
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





