The Spook Who Sat by the Door (1973)
Facts
| Directed by | Ivan Dixon |
| Cast | Lawrence Cook, Ramon Livingston, Tyrone R. Livingston, Colostine Boatwright, Robert Franklia, Ray Anthony, Doug Johnson, Byron Morrow and Anthony Ray |
| Theatrical Release | November 30, 1972 |
| DVD Release | January 27, 2004 |
| Running Time | 102 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | PG (Parental Guidance Suggested) |
| UPC Code | 723952076595 |
| Buy this item | $19.95 at Amazon.com As of Aug 27 4:58 EDT (details) 1 DVD, Monarch Video, Usually ships in 24 hours, DVD-Video, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language) Or 17 new from $14.27, 5 used from $13.49 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for The Spook Who Sat by the Door posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| Good movie for the right mentality. |
| Brothers and Sisters, I do not think you are ready for this film because it may already be too late!!!!! |
| * * * * * on concept... get the novel ! |
In the late 60's/early 70's, the air was ripe with talk of revolution.
White people too spoke of it... but in a different way. a.k.a. "The blacks are taking over!"
This film is a dramatization of both the dream (or fantasy) and the nightmare... And the idea of working within the system just enough to learn the ropes, then using it to your own good... (A play on the debate if taking advantage of the system makes one a sell out... a.k.a. Uncle Tom.)
Conceptually speaking, that's what makes this film great...
It is not a typical B-movie "exploitation" film with the revolutionaries being afro-wig wearing stereotypes, and the political content just being backdrop for the car chases... its a film with a message... To that extent its in a league of its own...
In addition, the production values are surprisingly good... Though an underground film, the production values hold their ground... Its a very well crafted film... even to the point of being slick. (The editor later went on to work for Steve Spielberg and is currently one of the top in his field.)
So why do I give the film three stars...? I feel it drags at times... but there may very well be an excuse... Incidental music (which is just as important as the visuals in any good film) is very important. My assumption is that the company that released it couldn't get the rights, so the soundtrack had to be muted. A shame because the original soundtrack was done by HERBIE HANCOCK (!) - - so what happens is you hear it faintly in the backround... at one point you even see a band playing and girl dancing, but you barely hear any music... The end result... the film feels a bit empty and spacey... and in parts where the music would have complimented the scenery (and visa versa) it just feels like empty space... so the film drags... The problem could probably easily be resolved by having one of today's "acid Jazz" bands provide a funky soundtrack in the same same style... but you have to be careful like that, because if the soundtrack is done cheaply, it diminishes the quality of the film... NO SOUNDTRACK however, makes it feel empty.
That aside, there are a few wonderful suprises, including an interview with the author/director, who is as militant and outspoken as ever. (Reminds me a bit of Melvin Van Peebles.) - - Robert Townsend gives his thoughts on the film... And there is plenty of hyping.
In conclusion, the idea of guerillas learning their game from the CIA is very interesting in today's climate... because that's exactly what's happening now regarding the war on terrorism... There is some irony though... when Kennedy was shot Malcolm X got into trouble for saying it was an example of "the chickens coming home to roost" - - On 9/11 the same thought came to my mind... Yes, it was a terrible thing, but when you have a foreign policy and shake a bee's nest, you can't blame when the bees come out and sting you to death. You can moralize that the bees were wrong, but that doesn't change the fact that you were stupid for provoking them. In fact, if a nearby person gets stung, its the person who provoked the bees fault, not the bees themselves whether or not their behavior is "right" or "wrong" or whether they were "right" or "wrong" for building the hive... - - This film, then can be watched from two perspectives: 1) As a fantasy that was very popular during that era. 2) As a warning of what happens when people feel surpressed and frustrated. Likewise, it is a play on every white bigot's worst nightmare: The help banding together and going far beyond merely steeling the silverware. (There is a very funny scene demonstrating this.)
So * * * * * in concept... Let's hope it gets recut, remade or re-released again! September 6, 2007
| A Frightening Vision |
This movie was made in 1973 in the aftermath of the civil rights struggles and violent deaths of many of the freedom rights strugglers, the rise of Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam and the militaristic Black Panthers under Huey Newton. Consequently, the time was ripe for a race war movie. While a race war will probably never take place in America, it is not impossible & it is certainly understandable that many blacks would be frustrated and angry enough to at least fantasize about a violent assertion of their rights and priviledges as U.S. citizens.
Why is it so surprising to many whites that blacks are fed up with being treated like second class people in their own country? Is it so impossible to imagine that the powerful will one day be forced to reap what they sow? I am white but I see this movie as an uncomfortable but necessary viewing experience in understanding how many blacks felt in the early 70's and how those feelings were (and continue to be) the product of the shameful way whites have treated blacks throughout the history of the American colonies and the country. September 1, 2007
| very strong film |
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





