Home   >   Movies   >   Servants of Twilight

Servants of Twilight (1991)

Facts

Directed byJeffrey Obrow
CastBruce Greenwood, Jarrett Lennon, Belinda Bauer, Grace Zabriskie, Richard Bradford, Dale Dye, James Harper, Jack Kehoe, Jillian McWhirter, Kelli Maroney, Patrick Massett, Charles Noland and Carel Struycken
Theatrical ReleaseNovember 30, 1990
MPAA RatingR (Restricted)
Buy this item ...1 new from $19.99
 

Website Links

  • Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
  • IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
  • Art.com - Search for Servants of Twilight posters.

Similar Movies

Phantoms
Phantoms
Mr. Murder
Mr. Murder
Black River
Black River
Hideaway
Hideaway
Demon Seed
Demon Seed

 

User Reviews

Average user review: 3.0 (11 reviews)

rating: 1 QuoteTerrible!Quote

Yes, I found this movie terrible. The acting was often over the top, but they mostly failed to convey the sense of impending danger that was warranted. Nor did they make me interested in the story. The violence was extreme. The ending was totally unbelevable--it was never even in the slightest forshadowed as a possibility. The directing was bad--moving much too fast for the viewer to develop the empathy and compassion necessary to feel for the little boy. Sound and fury was this director's apparent goal. In the book a genuine love relationship was developed between the two protagonists, but here we get nothing more than a one-night stand. The characters were hollow--there was no real substance here and no motivation given for the male protagonist's overinvolvement in the case.

With appropiate talent, the book could have been converted into a great thriller, but all we get here is commercial claptrap. Don't waste your time and money on this. If you loathe logic and credibility, you'll love this movie. October 14, 2007

rating: 2 QuoteDeparture From The NovelQuote
The movie version of Dean Koontz's novel contained many changes; that is to be expected. A novel won't translate to the big screen verbatim. The problem here is that many of the changes were ineffective in that they didn't help to develop the characters or progress the story. I don't think that I would've liked the movie at all if I hadn't read the book and that should not be required protocol in order to enjoy a film.

This movie had the feel of a made for TV movie, and by that I mean one of the older B rate TV movies, kind of like a cheesie Lifetime movie. It was a combination of unknown actors spewing bad dialogue -written simply for the sake of exposition - while wearing horrible wardrobe filmed in overdone lighting. The actors, who seemed pretty credible, never had a chance.

This could have been good, actually it could have been very good. Some of the changes from the novel should have translated excellently on screen. The screenpaly would have benefited from a rewrite. Too many scenes were repetitive. How many times do we need to see gunmen sneak up on the boy? Eliminate a few of those scenes and develop some backstory. How about some character development?

If you read the book, it's worth it to see how it translated to film. It only takes up 90 minutes of your life. July 16, 2005

rating: 3 QuoteHollywoods misfortunesQuote
It is unfortunate that Hollywood cannnot do a writer justice, they usually change the script so repetively that the author's true genius is lost. If Midnight or Lightning had been made into movies Hollywood would have botch them.This movie comes dangerously close to it. Thank God it is only fictional or they would have totally castrated it, as they did with Black Hawk Down and We were soldiers once and young. With the exception of Pixar Studios and a few select films Hollywood castrates everthing they touch. My advice read the books, and carefully choose your movies. I mean how many times have you said aloud, whether you have cable or satelite there is nothing on worth watching. My god look at horrible the news is done, no more true hardball reporting, just reporting for couch potatoes to damn lazy to read the news and get an in depth report. May 24, 2004

rating: 5 QuoteEnding Rather FreakyQuote
Okay, I thought Jarrett Lennon (who portrayed "Joey") was extraordinarily REAL and natural. Wish he'd get more acting jobs! I hated that the ending wasn't true to the book's ending... but it wasn't bad. I greatly appreciated Grace Zabriskie's contribution to this movie. The special effects were also surprisingly good. September 28, 2003

rating: 3 QuoteNot too shabbyQuote
I've read the book, as well as seen the movie, and I don't think they did too bad a job with it. The only thing that leaves me curious is the fact that the movie came to the conclusion that Joey was the Antichrist after all. The book was far more ambiguous about it, and left it totally up in the air as to whether Joey was who the church loonies claimed him to be, or whether he was, in fact, a child of light.
Still, not too bad an effort at all. June 25, 2003

More reviews at Amazon.com ...