Cambridge Spies (2003)
Facts
| Directed by | Tim Fywell |
| Cast | Tom Hollander, Samuel West, Rupert Penry-Jones, Toby Stephens, Jenna Harrison, Nicholas Day, Peter Eyre, Marcel Iures and Leon Lissek |
| Theatrical Release | November 30, 2002 |
| DVD Release | December 2, 2003 |
| Running Time | 240 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | NR (Not Rated) |
| UPC Code | 794051186324 |
| Buy this item | $13.99 at Amazon.com As of Jul 17 13:55 EDT (details) 2 DVD, Warner Brothers, Usually ships in 24 hours, Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, DVD-Video, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language - Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo), English (Subtitled) Or 38 new from $13.98, 16 used from $13.00 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Cambridge Spies posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| Upper Class Revolutionaries |
Blunt and Philby, in public statements years after they were unmasked, all claimed that they became Communist spies in an attempt to better the world. You do see a little of this desire to make things better in an incident near the beginning of the film, when Burgess and Philby foment a strike by the waiters at their college, but overall the four don't seem to have had much first hand knowledge of the people whose lives they claimed to want to improve through a Communist revolution. The film does make clear the interesting point that the four were able to go about their espionage efforts for many years precisely because they were priviledged, elite people who knew all the right things to say and had entree into the highest circles. The proverbial old boys club was hard at work for these four, and they knew it and used it.
At times the film seems to overglamourize the four, toning down the more sordid aspects of their lives (except in the case of the flamboyant and disreputable Guy Burgess) and barely acknowledging that they did real damage to Britain and the rest of the West through their espionage. But its a well depicted and beautifully acted dramatic reenactment of one episode in the Cold War. The extra material provided on the second DVD is interesting as well, including interviews with Blunt and Philby after their unmaskings, BBC obituaries for Philby and Maclean, and a bizarre excerpt from a film about the Queen's Gallery in Buckingham Palace, made in the 1960s and partly narrated by Blunt himself. (There's also a rather mediocre History Channel presentation about the Cambridge spies which provides a little more information about their lives and times.) July 1, 2008
| Headline: American TV infects the BBC! |
Why is "Cambridge Spies" so bad? It's not because the film is pretty unhistorical. I've never understood those people who complain that fictional works about historical events aren't more "accurate." Surely no one watches historical drama for a history lesson (at least they shouldn't).
What makes the film so deadly is, first of all, terrible writing. The script is full of sentimental one-liners, and seems utterly incapable of nuance or gradation (for example, the character McLean meets his future wife--horribly played by a no-talented Jenna Harrison--and woos, beds, marries, and rescues her from the Nazis in all of 5 minutes). Sadly, the script got worse as the 4-part series progressed.
The poor quality of the script may account for the leaden acting displayed by virtually everyone in the film. But one senses that a great deal of the film's flatness must be chalked up to untalented actors. The above-mentioned Harrison is so utterly awful that watching her is embarrassing. Tom Hollander as Guy Burgess has some very good moments, particularly in the first part of the series, but his portrayal becomes predictable and tedious (lots of shouting and histrionics). Samuel West as Anthony Blount plays a character so tightly wound that he's in chronic danger of becoming unhinged. But West's handling of the character reduces Blount to a rather sissified, simpering worry-wart. Rupert Penry-Jones and Toby Stephens as Philby and McLean don't bear mentioning. Both of them seem to have but one facial expression in their acting repertoir, and that a hangdog look of dejected worry.
All in all, a film to miss. April 20, 2008
| Fascinating |
| Growing Up to Be a Spy |
the Cold War era. The production focuses on the ideas and events which drew these men into the twilight world of espionage, and offers a rather limited depiction of the deterioration of their lives and careers as a result of their politics and their character flaws.
The writer and director of this BBC production display sympathy for these men who make a commitment wihout clearly anticipating where their youthful enthusiam may lead later in life. The sympathy the characters evoke is, in large measure,dependent on the efforts of four gifted young British actors who succeed in communicating the raw nerves and psychological pain of these increasingly desperate men. The stress of their undercover work fractures both their personal and professional lives. Definitely not a good advertisement for a career as a spy!
November 2, 2007
| For those like myself who were mystified by "Blunt, the Fourth Man" and "Another Country" |
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





