Shape of Things (2003)
Facts
| Directed by | Neil LaBute |
| Cast | Paul Rudd, Rachel Weisz, Gretchen Mol and Fred Weller |
| Theatrical Release | November 30, 2002 |
| Video Release | September 23, 2003 |
| Running Time | 96 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | R (Restricted) |
| UPC Code | 096896126139 |
| Buy this item ... | 5 new from $4.60, 9 used from $0.87 |
About Shape of Things
Controversial director Neil LaBute tweaks our culture's moral compass in his dark comedy The Shape of Things. Dorky museum guard Adam (indie heartthrob Paul Rudd, made to look as dweebish as possible) meets student Evelyn (Rachel Weisz) as she's preparing to deface a classical statue; instead of stopping her, he musters up the courage to ask her out. But soon he finds himself so completely in her thrall that he willingly succumbs to her every want--and she wants him to change his hair, his clothes, his face, even his friends (Frederick Weller and Gretchen Mol). In In the Company of Men, LaBute presented two men cruelly experimenting with a deaf woman's affections; The Shape of Things proposes that women can be just as monstrous. Though LaBute could stand to delve more deeply, this well-acted and cunningly written film will provoke conversation afterwards--and not many movies nowadays can do that. --Bret Fetzer Amazon.com
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Shape of Things posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| Quick ship - Perfect Condition |
| Ok - not as good as In the Company of Men |
| Gets where it was going |
Solid comedy of modern manners full of acerbic edginess, brought from stage to screen pretty decently. December 1, 2007
| Remember most reviews.... |
SoT gives an excellent depiction of a psychopathic woman who uses her position as a graduate art student to destroy an unsuspecting fairly decent guy. Whether that was the intention of the filmmaker I can't say. I wasn't interested enough to watch it again with the commentary track.
However the movie has one big inherent flaw.... it doesn't end. It cops out and leaves the viewer with the plot unresolved. So it is a play in two acts and as Shakespeare so amply showed us a good play is in three acts.
Maybe the director couldn't come up with an ending and so left it this way hoping that the viewers would do like so many viewers do and make excuses for his incompetence for him. I don't blame him. It works pretty well. Look how many people here he fooled. July 11, 2007
| thought provoking |
There's a very sinister suprise ending that made me say...HOW COULD SHE DO THAT? Check it out, it's not too bad!
June 24, 2007
More reviews at Amazon.com ...




