Murder by Numbers (2002)
Facts
|
Murder by Numbers (Full Screen Edition)
DVD Price: You save 8%! As of Sep 5 20:51 EDT (details)
|
| Directed by | Barbet Schroeder |
| Cast | Sandra Bullock, Ben Chaplin, Ryan Gosling, Michael Pitt (II), Agnes Bruckner, Dennis Cockrum, Neal Matarazzo, Chris Penn, Tom Verica and John Vickery |
| Theatrical Release | April 19, 2002 |
| DVD Release | September 24, 2002 |
| Running Time | 120 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | R (Restricted) |
| UPC Code | 085392276424 |
| Buy this item | $11.99 at Amazon.com As of Sep 5 20:51 EDT (details) 1 DVD, Warner Home Video, Usually ships in 24 hours, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DVD-Video, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language) Or 65 new from $1.95, 104 used from $0.57, 4 collectible from $12.98 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Murder by Numbers posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| Disappointed |
| great suspense drama movie |
| It's a little `paint by numbers', but Gosling's performance makes it worth your time... |
The film focuses on a disturbing murder of a young woman and the detective who tracks down the two boys who committed the crime. Sandra plays that said detective; Cassie Mayweather. Cassie has her own issues (when I mentioned clichés I was talking about her back-story; very been there done that) and these issues make this case all the more pertinent to her. The two boys who committed this crime; Richard and Justin; have a fun time stringing the detectives along with planted clues to lead them down the wrong path, all the while laughing in the face of destiny.
Sadly, these two young killers are also nothing more than a collective sum of movie villain clichés. Richard is the sarcastic and witty popular kid who bosses Justin around with confidence and a false sense of loyalty while Justin is the stark opposite; shy and introverted and obviously harboring some sort of attraction towards Richard, most likely due to Richard's apparent dominance.
A major highlight to the film, and something that helps elevate it to `worth checking out' territory, is Ryan Gosling's dynamic performance. Gosling has grown into one of our finest young actors as of late, and his performance here is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to his abilities. What he does with Richard is phenomenal, taking an overly clichéd and familiar character and infusing so much originality and style that he becomes a character belonging only to Gosling. Sure, this same type of character has been attempted plenty of times before, but rarely this well.
As far as the remaining performances are concerned, they pale in comparison. Bullock does turn in some nice moments but this is far from her comfort zone and it shows. I commend her for branching out a bit but this is not her usual greatness. Ben Chaplin is really here to fill space and add to Mayweather's personal life. He is decent but forgettable. Michael Pitt, an actor who I can take or leave (I thought he was decent in `The Dreamers' but nothing special), is really pitiful here. He falls into his characters clichés full throttle and doesn't seem able to rise above them. He seems to play to his odd appearance too much, relying on his `little boy face' too much in order to relay his characters feelings. It doesn't work so well for him. When he attempts `brooding' it looks more like a young child who is pouting.
In the end I can say that `Murder by Numbers' is a decent thriller. What helps is the fact that the plot is interesting and the script is in parts very smart. It's a nice play on the `cat and mouse' type crime genre and, as I mentioned, Gosling really does make the most of what he's given. It's not perfect and it may never warrant repeat viewings but if you haven't seen it then you won't be wasting any time if you do. It is satisfying in what it's here for. It's just a shame the characters are a little too `paint by numbers'.
I couldn't resist. April 24, 2008
| "Psychos want to get caught." |
Actually, we know who did it from the first moments of the film; the fun lies in seeing how Cassie will connect the dots and catch them. This is a terrific movie, full of suspense and action. Bullock's character wears a mask of bravado but is really quite wounded from a tragic incident in her past; this makes her vulnerable and likeable, and she has great screen presence. Chaplin holds his own with her, mixing detective work with inevitable romance, and Gosling and Pitt are outstanding as the creepy teens who think they've committed the perfect crime. We've seen this same basic plot before in Rope and Compulsion, and it's just as good here; a cat a mouse game that's intelligent and scary and kept me on the edge of my seat. Heartily recommended for fans of crime stories and of the talented Ms Bullock. December 23, 2007
| Great early Gosling...but Bullock fails to convince |
Michael Pitt, as the other killer, is a creepy presence as well...but he's a more predictable character...just kinda morose and an obvious outsider. He has no charisma (nor should he) and Gosling's character just stomps all over him. One could argue that Gosling isn't playing the movie at the same level as the rest of the cast...he's up on a different plane...and therefore he's really upstaging his fellow actors. But honestly, if it weren't for his out-there intensity...the movie would be a waste of time.
So, the criminals are mostly fun to watch. We enjoy seeing how they put it all together, and how the start to fall apart as the cops move in. That's fine. But on the other side, we have the "good guys" primarily represented by Sandra Bullock. We're to believe she's this damaged soul, driven to take reckless shortcuts and driven to sleep with (and dispose of) all her male partners. It's possible that a more feral actress, or a more skillful one, could have pulled off this rather ridiculous character. But Bullock flounders. Her relationship with her fellow cops consists mostly of her tossing off insults and innuendos...followed by unconvincing scenes of seduction. When she tries to rub Ben Chaplin's groin with her sock covered foot in an effort to arouse him...it was cringe-inducing...because Bullock looked so totally uninterested. Obviously, her character has been badly wounded in the past, and we can understand that her relationships with others might be spotty...but mostly she comes across as unlikeable and UNSYMPATHETIC. That's the big problem...we don't feel for her...we just dislike her.
The plot itself is fairly straightforward...and frankly, it wasn't really too hard to get these two "perfect criminals." It's the cat-and-mouse aspect we're most supposed to enjoy, as Gosling and Bullock play with each other. Gosling holds up his end of the act quite admirably...Bullock not so much.
It's an okay movie, and if you're a Gosling fan, it's a must see. But this SILENCE OF THE LAMB wannabe falls short of that high mark by a long shot. The Silence of the Lambs (Two-Disc Collector's Edition) September 25, 2007
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





