The Missiles of October (1974)
Facts
| Directed by | Anthony Page |
| Cast | William Devane, Ralph Bellamy, Howard Da Silva, James Hong, Martin Sheen, Clifford David, John Dehner, Dana Elcar, Arthur Franz, Paul Lambert and Michael Lerner |
| Theatrical Release | December 18, 1974 |
| DVD Release | June 26, 2001 |
| Running Time | 150 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | NR (Not Rated) |
| UPC Code | 030306632421 |
| Buy this item | $10.99 at Amazon.com As of Jul 18 17:08 EDT (details) 1 DVD, Mpi Home Video, Usually ships in 24 hours, Color, DVD-Video, NTSC Languages: English (Subtitled), English (Original Language - Dolby Digital 5.1) Or 24 new from $7.93, 5 used from $11.34, 1 collectible from $24.95 |
About The Missiles of October
Without becoming didactic, The Missiles of October does an outstanding job of presenting many points of view on the Cuban missile crisis. The film humanizes Kennedy's near impossible task of avoiding war without compromising national security. The earnestness of this 1974 made-for-television dramatization may briefly remind one of social studies class--indeed it is at times difficult to maintain consciousness while the extensive cast of characters is being introduced at the opening. Not to worry, though--soon the power plays begin and The Missiles of October becomes completely gripping. Actual news footage is spliced in with the action, nicely serving as exposition and driving home just how very close the world came to nuclear war. A crew of excellent character actors flesh out the story and reveal the psychological games behind the language of diplomacy. William Devane takes on the difficult task of playing John F. Kennedy. While he doesn't quite capture Kennedy's charisma, he does occupy the role comfortably and effectively conveys the president's deep worry and determination to avoid war. Martin Sheen plays an engaging Robert Kennedy and Michael Lerner, oddly enough, manages to make Pierre Salinger absolutely fascinating. --Ali Davis Amazon.com
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for The Missiles of October posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| A Movie Everyone Should See |
| THE ULTIMATE WMDS |
| A classic confrontation between Kennedy and Kruschauve |
| Cuban Missile Crisis History Lesson in 155 Minutes |
HERE'S MY AMAZON DISCLAIMER: Regarding other reviews here, it's hard to argue against any statement that this movie "idolizes JFK," because it's based on RFK's book about their actions regarding the Cuban Missile Crisis. Therefore, in assuming his perspective, saying the film is idolizing JFK is unethical, as we should be lucky that he wrote the book in the first place. I mean, calling it "idolizing" basically throws away the fact of its biographical existence of a specific moment of history. Everything is first-hand information with his own person, JFK, being the central character. Therefore, it's going to take his side, as who else's would it assume? This is not idolization, but dramatic biography! Docu-drama. Does one who accuses this movie of idolization also accuse it of depicting events that did not happen as according to its author? If not, then I submit the criticism of idolization has nothing to do with anything. I mean, one could call it biased, and be right, as it would have to be, since it is FFK's story and not someone else's! I'm not sure what "idolizing" means. But, onto my review:
I'm not sure about some of the information about what written material this movie was based on, but immediate informal research concludes that this movie was based partly on Robert F. Kennedy's book "Thirteen Days" about the Cuban Missile Crisis. If you remember this name somehow, it's probably due to the book's remake into a movie in 2000 (premiered in 1999) with the same title by director Roger Donaldson, with Kevin Costner in a co-starring role.
The name is a reference to a book entitled "The Guns of August," a book about the Great War (a.k.a. WWI) addressing problems of the combination of the "real politik" paradigm, the German words for realism--a study of politics from the linking of the world through self-interest and armed conflict--with the virtue of the paradigm of idealism. Since the Cuban Missile Crisis occurred in October, the movie's name, "The Missiles of October," is a comment on the former to denote the potential seriousness of the incidents in this crisis which were mainly in the drama of JFK's decisions to avert nuclear war against the communistic U.S.S.R.
The movie has an exceptional cast, and a large one, with actors with long and noticeable careers in cinema long before 1973, even in the days of black-and-white. Otherwise, Soviet Premier Khrushchev is played by Howard DaSilva, who had memorably co-starred in the film version of the stage musical "1776" playing Ben Franklin, the delegate and inventor; in Joseph Losey's film "M"; and, in "The Great Gatsby" with Robert Redford. Also, John Kennedy's brother Robert is played by Martin Sheen, and he had went on to star in "Apocalypse Now" and several other films.
The thirteen days of the Cuban Missile Crisis has since become a subject of study, and this film should be recommended to anyone studying this moment of history, because it is a very literary translation, playing out with the drama being solely located in the scripts themselves: both the screenplay script and the actual international relations scripts from which this movie seems to borrow so much.
In comparison between this 1974 television movie to the 2000 film version, the t.v. movie is very talky, but still manages quite well to pull off the drama which is mostly in the script. The film version has the same dramatic themes obviously, but they are much more well-funded with expensive shots of military crafts both air and sea, an even larger cast, and never-before-seen footage of real nuclear explosions, this time in beautifully full color film rather than the black-and-white stock for the videotaped t.v. movie. The theatrical film version lacks the character of the Soviet Premier, and so it seems much less "talky" than the t.v. version. The t.v. version had already made JFK as the central figure only to tell the story in dramatic sequence rather than in defense of him since it is based on JFK's book, so his characterization is like a lion, as this method is the best way to tell the story that is virtually his anyway. If it had not done this with his perspective, it would've decreased the suspense. The television movie deserves a lot of credit for being able to maintain that suspense through the excellent cast and script, much of which is taken from historic speeches. Ultimately, the t.v. movie is about how JFK had de-pressurized the system, where the film version does this much more in such a way as to imprint an image of JFK in memory.
In result of the historical events as they are portrayed in the t.v. movie, the JFK character mentions his own lack of air support in the Bay of Pigs invasion. It connects the Soviet Premier's placement of missiles in Cuba as a partial belief of the impotence of a U.S. president that is younger than his first son. Nevertheless, with JFK responding by cutting off Cuba from the Soviets, the Americans and the Soviets begin towing the line, in addition to the nuclear threat, as JFK is not only aware of the nuclear missiles the Soviets have placed in Cuba, but is threatening to attack on the moment those missiles become operational. Finally, after military maneuvers and the sole casualty of an American spy plane, the two leaders finally defuse the situation on agreement, in-turn avoiding nuclear war. September 28, 2007
| The Missiles of October |
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





