Home   >   Movies   >   The Fountain

The Fountain (2006)

Facts

The Fountain (Widescreen Edition)
DVD Price: $9.99
As of Jul 21 20:18 EDT (details)

Buy from Amazon.co.ukBuy from Amazon.co.uk
Directed byDarren Aronofsky
CastHugh Jackman, Rachel Weisz, Sean Patrick Thomas, Ellen Burstyn, Mark Margolis, Lorne Brass and Stephen McHattie
Theatrical ReleaseNovember 22, 2006
DVD ReleaseMay 15, 2007
Running Time96 minutes
MPAA RatingPG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
UPC Code085392837625
Buy this item$9.99 at Amazon.com
As of Jul 21 20:18 EDT (details)
1 DVD, WEISZ,RACHEL, Usually ships in 24 hours, AC-3, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, Dubbed, DVD-Video, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
Languages: English (Original Language - Dolby Digital 5.1), English (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled), French (Subtitled), French (Dubbed - Dolby Digital 5.1)
Or 50 new from $6.86, 45 used from $4.75
 

Website Links

Similar Movies

Alexander, Revisited - The Final Cut [Blu-ray]
Alexander, Revisited - The Final Cut [Blu-ray]
Sunshine
Sunshine
The Lookout
The Lookout
The Road Warrior [Blu-ray]
The Road Warrior [Blu-ray]
The Good German
The Good German

 

User Reviews

Average user review: 3.5 (356 reviews)

rating: 5 QuoteAranofsky's latest masterpieceQuote
I watched this about a year ago and this film still resonates with vivid images. It is fundamentally a story about loss, death and the nature of mortality/immortality. Intermixed among the film are 3 stories. One set in the present, one in 16th century Spain and one in the far future. The film is lush with imagery, some of which is difficult to grasp due to the fact that the narrative jumps between these 3 timelines. Ultimately, it is a story about transcending desire and mortality. Hugh Jackman was amazing in his role as is Rachel Weiss as the Queen of Spain. July 7, 2008

rating: 2 Quotenot art-house, not sci-fiQuote
i'm quite a fan of art house film and a fan of sci fi and i have to say this doesn't appeal to either of those parts of me enough to keep this dvd. something was missing, it left me indiferent. it was a little foreign film noir, a little sci fi and a little life drama. but it just floated along i get the feeling the producers were way more interested in aesthetics, imagery symbiosis and juggling their changing but well-utilized budget. i loved the spanish historical vignettes. the space bits were very organic, visually mature and cool to watch. oh and the unrelenting procession of "imagery completion" at the end of the movie killed the space, poise and pace that was set up throughout. ironically hugh jackman 'attracted' the money to complete the film but i reckon they could have got some 'young and unknown', and with the spare money, hired some of those crack american scripts doctors to really angle the market they missed in the US.
try: sound of the sea, immortal, solaris, gattaca, code 46, 2001 space odyssey for a more memorable, similar experience. June 30, 2008

rating: 5 QuoteA homage to Kubrick - with a splash of Aronofsky's love of cinemaQuote
Without a doubt, Darren Aronofsky has subtly crafted the best film of the year. With this film, he has introduced a brave new paintbrush, a canvas that would be unpopular with the amateur cinefile, but over time will be considered an independent classic. Like he has done with such powerful films like "Pi" and "Requiem for a Dream", Aronofsky, with "The Fountain" has entered into the ranks of such budding directors as Richard Kelly and Christopher Nolan. While his work may never be seen as mainstream, his thoughts are continuous, his sentences are bold and detailed, and his worlds are pure imagination. This, "The Fountain", simply defines what a movie-going experience should be like. He forces the audience to think, use the visual clues throughout to tell us the themes without making our antagonist speak them loudly for audiences to hear. He designs outside the lines, and his film are considered too "thinking" for the average viewer, but to me, this was a movie, simply put, about love. "The Fountain" is one of those broad scoping epic stories that felt eerily Kubrik-ian with its style, but purely Aronofsky with its imagery. This is not a story for the weak of heart (or mind for that matter), but simply a story about a never aging love pushed through the heartstrings of immortality.

To begin, Aronofsky has designed a beautiful cast to represent this story. In several interviews, he talks about his desire to make a science-fiction film, and at first I was skeptical on how well "Van Helsing" himself could voice Aronofsky words, but coupled with Rachel Weiss, the two are magic. Hugh Jackman is phenomenal in the role of conquistador, scientist, and finally explorer. His expressions are Oscar worthy, and his projection of honesty is empowering. He devours each of these three segments with enough force that accolades should have come his way. Coupled with the way Aronofsky framed this film, the two work hand in hand. There is little told of Tommy's love for Izzi, but what Jackman creates through his characters transforms this from a mediocre missed sci-fi romance to something bolder, and more determined. Jackman with Weiss create another fold in this story all together. From their initial meeting, the symbolism of the ring, the connections between the decades were subtle, but the two create chemistry with their whispers, their body language, and their obvious passion for this project. This was not simply a Aronofsky film, but a story that all actors, visuals, and gaffers embraced. From the opening shot you could tell that we were unprepared for this ride that Jackman wasn't going to be "cute", but instead determined and sad at the same time. We were ready for the science fiction, but the history, the honest love, the religious symbols were exciting and fresh. Again, Kubrick would have giving Aronofsky a standing ovation, his lessons have been passed to a new generation, and they don't believe in dumb blockbusters. This was a science fiction film second, a love story first, which reminded me further of Kubrick's "2001" - perhaps this was a bit of an homage to that. This was a project of passion and all the cast embodied it.

Aronofsky's storytelling abilities continue to impress. From "Pi" I was immediately hooked and with his honest adaptation of "Requiem for a Dream", he proved that he could tackle anything from the absurd to the taboo. Science fiction wasn't going to stop him, but it wasn't going to be your average story. This was going to demonstrate the longevity of love and the secrets of our universe. His choice of edits, quick cuts, and powerful angles are more than impressive. He constructs a story that spans eras, but still feels grounded in one specific moment. It felt like listening to a remake of a classic song, while the beats may be different - the same message was being sent. His attention to detail was magnificent. I love cinema that forces you to remember other moments from earlier, small symbolic items, or details that may seem unimportant at the time, but as the focus becomes concentrated, it becomes clear. This is more than just a film, but an experience similar to that of fighting for the love of your life. To me, that is what transformed "The Fountain" from your average sci-fi experience to something larger. Aronofsky created an emotion, not just a visual reference, and you experience the film for the themes he created. This isn't a sit-back-and-relax film, but an emotional roller coaster of truth and honesty. Kubrick has done it, Aronofsky just expanded the premise.

With such praise for this bold new image, a comment should be made that it wasn't perfect. The small blemishes were nearly hidden by the epic scope of this story. The blemishes could be the lack of decibels during the whispering moments. Aronofsky creates the unknown when Tommy whispers into the tree or to his wife, clues that will bring us full circle soon, but I found myself using the subtitle button to ensure that I found the words correctly. The other small blemish could be the other characters surrounding Tommy and Izzi. Aronofsky brought a couple back from his other films, but their emotions were staged and wooden. They added very little to this story and the overall sensation of "The Fountain". While I see the value of them being around our characters (to build the world), this could have simply been a story about two people, their love, and their quest.

Overall, "The Fountain" was a fresh new film experience for me. With the downtrodden nature of the Hollywood recycling bin, I was beginning to give up hope that imagination would still be used in today's releases. As always, audiences were not as forthcoming with this film, and a quick release to DVD was inevitable. This is a movie that is beautiful, poignant, and symbolic all at the same time - it forces you to think, use your mind, and find the hidden clues throughout. This is not a film for all, but many should experience it. The acting was superb, possibly the best we will see from Hugh Jackman, and Aronofsky's style and image stood on their own two feet. This was a well-rounded film with slight blemishes that would never been seen by the amateur film watcher. It took you all over the map without pity or remorse. "The Fountain" was like watching a disciple of Kubrick announce his final project. Aronofsky continues to impress with his films. They have huge depth and range, yet easily forgotten through the course of the year. "The Fountain" should have won awards, and in time I think it will, but for now it needs to be watched and recommended. This is one of my favorites of the year.

Grade: ***** out of *****
June 12, 2008

rating: 5 QuoteWorth your time & money...Quote
I have never written a review on Amazon, because I never felt committed to defending or criticizing the spending of someone else's money. I am breaking my own rule today, because this film deserves it. This is a film that deserves to be seen by as many people as possible. It deserves the right to be celebrated as a cinematic masterpiece. Plain and simple: "The Fountain" is perfect. The effects, the drama, the chemistry of the actors.

To give this film one star or two stars because one "didn't get it" is a travesty. I "got it" the first time I saw it. It's about life and death, true love, our own egotism and our worst fears. It's about acceptance, regret and loss. It's about life; the universal struggles that we each go through, today or two-thousand years from now.

Don't deny yourself the privilege to experience this film. It is worth it.
June 11, 2008

rating: 5 QuoteGive it a chanceQuote
I can't recall a movie so completely trashed by the critics as this unappreciated gem. The score is stunning. Some of the images, breathtaking. As far as the narrative, it is not your drab, formula-driven, 3-act, Hollywood vehicle. It is thought-provoking and original. This movie is worth seeing. May 30, 2008

More reviews at Amazon.com ...