Joseph Andrews (1977)

Joseph Andrews

I did not like this movie at all. I purchased it because of all the good reviews. I guess it was supposed to be funny but I found it to be very very silly. Not much of a plot to this story. August 22, 2008

A worthy prequel to 'Tom Jones'

The 1742 novel 'Joseph Andrews' was author Fielding's second of three reinterpretations of his friend and rival Samuel Richardson's 1740 bestseller 'Pamela', a book he found so enticing for its sensible virtue and salacious voyeurism that he felt compelled to capitalise on the trend towards moralistic fables. ('Pamela' was the first novel printed in America, by Ben Franklin, in 1744.) In 'Joseph Andrews', Fielding depicts Pamela's brother as he endures a trek home from London in ignominy after his employer, the recently widowed and newly hot-to-trot Lady Booby, has fired him for spurning her advances. A Shakespearean concoction of plot twists ensues, in which Joseph may be Pamela's brother, or not, his fiancee's sister, or not, and Lady Booby's son, or not. In this the story becomes a comic picaresque in the tradition of 'Don Quixote', just the travels of two guys trying to go home, carrying with them a noble mission and the need for self-preservation in the face of many opportunities and threats.

Film interpretations of Fielding always have a tall order, because the author cut his teeth as a hack playwright in 1720s London and developed an infallible sense of how to tease and please an audience for profit. This movie delights just as the 1963 version of 'Tom Jones' does, and for the same reasons (having the same director being the biggest), although it is not shortened as much as 'Tom Jones' and therefore retains much more of Fielding's flavour, balance and scale. Michael Hordern would not have been my first choice for the humble Parson Adams (I would have preferred one more like Roy Kinnear) but he plays the infallibly and perhaps unrealistically upright character with dignity and charm. Ann-Margaret returns a surprising performance as a ridiculously insatiable English gentlewoman, though perhaps by playing Fielding's Lady Booby she could not have refrained from displaying her chest. But the aptly named Natalie Ogle as Joseph's fiancee Fanny tends to lose her shirt a few times too. though more as a victim than a vamp, and that is entirely in keeping with a bawdy 1740s English comedy anyway. All the bare breasts and bottoms (as well as the sexual innuendo) in 'Andrews' are done with a responsible sense of comedic timing and decorum, not merely gratuitously, and as such are both genuinely funny and a statement on the pitiable circumstances of the characters-- or, in the end, their marital bliss. That makes the movie all the more delectable; but it is NOT family fare (and got rated R for it).

As a die-hard 'Pamela' fan I found it a treat to at last get to see this story on DVD and especially to see this character done so well. There has never been a distributed video version of 'Pamela' (and there should be) and though in his book Fielding represents Samuel Richardson's heroine after her marriage to 'Mr B' as haughty and selfish, here director Tony Richardson shows her as warm and compassionate, appropriately satisfied with having taken the high road and thus able to be a good influence on the happy outcome of her brother's trials. Karen Dotrice has the right look, as the character has been depicted in the contemporary Highmore painting series, and the right amount of virtuous prettiness to deserve this thespian's mantle.

But it is Peter Firth who takes the whole show, invariably cute in a 1970s/Mark Hammill goodness, with his tousled blond locks and hairless chest and coy white-toothed smile embodying an innocence and eagerness that the sarcastically grinning Albert Finney did not in 'Tom Jones'. In the scene filmed in the actual Roman baths he is only a sweet-natured trusting boy, more impressed with having climbed a tree to win a prize in front of his fair maiden Fanny at the fair than with the sight of Lady Booby's clinging wet shirt right in front of him. Throughout the movie he has the single-minded virtue of a superhero waiting in disguise, and the viewer pulls for him in every step of the way home.

See this one before 'Tom Jones', as that's how Fielding wrote them, and you'll recognise the author's development of both character and plot that guided him towards his better-known 1749 masterpiece. They're both good movies and far easier for most than reading the books ('Tom Jones' is 933 pages!). January 23, 2008

A cracking comedy.

A marvellous adaptation of the Feilding novel, with a interesting and varied cast. It is very bawdy, highly sexual and much in the style of a Shakespeare's "Twelth Night" for the confusion and naughtiness that emits from mistaken identity.
A good version of the story but do follow the age guidelines as it features a lot of adult content and a fairly long scene of full frontal male nudity, in spite of the age of the film. March 13, 2005

Not quite "Tom Jones", but delightful

"Joseph Andrews" is not as witty, charming, and disarming as its predecessor, "Tom Jones", but performances by Ann Margaret and, even moreso, Beryl Reid, lend this film its best moments. The film's hero is a bit bland, his love interest beyond bland, and the film has the feel of "haven't we been here before... and wasn't it funnier then?" There are some genuinely funny moments, but the real reason to see it is the aforementioned Ms. Reid.
The late Beryl Reid, one of the most underrated (and sadly least filmed) character actresses of the film age, is Lady Booby's maid, Slipshod. Her scenes are the best in the film and it's a rare opportunity to see this actress in a role that she can sink her teeth into. See also the hard-to-find "Entertaining Mr. Sloane" and "The Killing of Sister George". May 14, 2004

Lady Booby: 'nuff said

What can I say? AM's finest moment. Spectacularly sleazy.

Oh, and the rest of the film's nice too, etc. December 12, 2003

More reviews at Amazon.com ...