I Shot Andy Warhol (1996)
Facts
| Directed by | Mary Harron |
| Cast | Lili Taylor, Jared Harris, Martha Plimpton, Lothaire Bluteau, Anna Levine, Craig Chester, Lynn Cohen, Myriam Cyr, Stephen Dorff, Peter Friedman, Jill Hennessy, Michael Imperioli, Donovan Leitch and Tahnee Welch |
| Theatrical Release | May 1, 1996 |
| DVD Release | January 23, 2001 |
| Running Time | 103 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | R (Restricted) |
| UPC Code | 027616857699 |
| Buy this item | $12.99 at Amazon.com As of Jul 24 17:13 EDT (details) 1 DVD, TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX HOME ENT, Usually ships in 24 hours, Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, DVD-Video, Widescreen, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language - Dolby Digital 2.0), Spanish (Original Language - Dolby Digital 2.0), French (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled) Or 21 new from $6.69, 18 used from $5.45, 1 collectible from $14.98 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for I Shot Andy Warhol posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| You're just being paranoid ... |
Valerie Solarnis was angry at the world, to say the least. She was a lesbian hooker in New York who was looking to publish her SCUM manifesto (the Society for Cutting Up Men). Indeed she had even presented it as her final thesis in college, why men are biologically inferrior to women. Eventually, she joins forces with a few of the trendy people, and gains access to The Factory. Here she meets Andy and the rest of his Warhol Superstars, a bunch of creative, eccentric people who are both innovative and pretentious. Heady with the promise of being with the In Crowd, Valerie even appears in one of Andy's Movies "I A Man", she anxiously hopes that he will publish her work. Andy, not really caring for it, yet just as vain as the next celebrity, puts her down. As she is descending into paranoia and obsessing on her own causes, Valerie walks into the Factory one day, pulls out a gun, and shoots Andy. She then walks out onto the street, hands to gun over to a policeman who just happened to be there on his beat, and said "I shot Andy Warhol".
What is this all about really? Mental health? Making a statement to others? Showing us that she was right and the whole rest of the world is wrong? No, it's about fame. She got her 15 minutes of fame. Then she was committed to a mental hospital and died there. End of story. She wasn't really trying to get her point across, she was just another nutcase who targeted a celebrity to make herself famous. Is that all it is? Yeah, that's all it is! August 3, 2007
| A Bizarre Film about Bizarre People |
Though often times difficult to watch with the scenes involving drug use and the various odd people that were part of Andy Warhol's life in New York City, it is the quality of the acting performances given principally by Lili Taylor, Jared Harris and Stephen Dorff (who played the drag queen known as Candy Darling, the only man that Valerie appeared to trust) that made "I Shot Andy Warhol" worth watching. For her efforts, Lili Taylor won a special recognition award for her performance in "I Shot Andy Warhol" at the 1996 Sundance Film Festival. The film, though low-budget, had very high production values and cinematography. Hence, my overall rating for "I Shot Andy Warhol" is 4 out of 5 stars.
February 18, 2007
| Lack of ambition! |
I shot Andy Warhol was by itself a fortunate idea but to my view, wasted the fabulous opportunity to show both sides of the coin. And the script would seem to be much more interested around the tragic anima and the psychical disturbances of the woman in question rather than to remark Warhol' s relevance in the Pop Art. Perhaps the aim was to consider his murder as simply a departure point, as historical reference and nothing else.
January 13, 2007
| Compelling look at some pretty bizzare people. |
I notice that a lot of negative reviews for this and other films consist of a rant about the film being the worst they ever saw, a waste of 2 hours, etc., but these folks never explain WHY they didn't like it. This is true for some of the bad reviews here.
Additionally, I'm not sure that that filmmaker Harron not taking a blantant stance against the SCUM Manifesto constitutes and endorsment of it; rather the opposite. It seems to me that Solanas' rants are so out there and crazy that it isn't necessary to say "Hey, this is wrong/bad/whatever." Her insane writtings speak for themselves. Why do people need to be spoon fed the obvious?
While not a masterpiece (hence the 4 stars), this certainly is a good movie and a fascinating subject. It is clearly not for everyone, as some of the reviews here illustrate. If you are into Warhol, 60's radicalism, the art scene, or that varried social movement called feminism, you'll like this movie. If not, this film is not for you. September 23, 2006
| Not a bad reconstruction of the early 70's |
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





