Rich in Love (1993)
Facts
| Directed by | Bruce Beresford |
| Cast | Albert Finney, Jill Clayburgh, Kathryn Erbe, Kyle MacLachlan and Piper Laurie |
| Theatrical Release | March 5, 1993 |
| Video Release | January 7, 1997 |
| Running Time | 105 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested) |
| UPC Code | 027616609533 |
| Buy this item ... | 1 new from $10.69, 12 used from $6.17, 2 collectible from $14.99 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Rich in Love posters.
User Reviews
Average user review:| Love the movie, And I Want it on DVD |
| no title |
| Star Turn For Albert Finney |
So maybe it has more to do with being a huge talent than with one's nationality. Still such solid performers as Piper Laurie and Jill Clayburgh kind of wander in and out of their accents here. Finney, however, is just about perfection here. And not just linguistically. He inhabits his role as the chronically perplexed retiree Warren Odom, who is attempting make sense of his wife's sudden abandonment of him and his high school aged daughter (Kathryn Erbe). More oblivious than truly insensitive, he ultimately has to come to terms with the fact that although he and his wife still love each other in their way, after 27 years, they can no longer live together.
Erbe also turns in a remarkable performance--especially considering that the actress, who was in her mid-twenties at the time the film was made, so convincingly plays a precocious high school senior. Also impressive is the film's one true Southerner, Suzy Amis as her impetuous newly wed (and ambivalently pregnant) sister. It's a lovingly dysfunctional Southern family, one that ultimately comes together in its clumsy, lopsided way. No easy answers here, but everybody grows up a little bit over the course of the film's two hours. And maybe that's the best you can hope for.
RICH IN LOVE doesn't make any grandiose statements, and that's all to the good. It's one of those "little movies" that somehow manages to reveal a few great truths about the human condition. And it offers a great performance by Albert Finney. Coincidentally, I recently also caught his follow-up film, THE BROWNING VERSION, as well. It's difficult to imagine two more divergent roles than the garrulous Southerner he plays here and the reserved English Classics teacher he portrayed in the latter film. He has a remarkable range, one that goes beyond a mere facility in mastering accents. His is a much deeper mastery indeed.
Nominated five times for an Academy Award, Finney has never won. His last nomination was in 2000 for a solid but certainly not stellar turn in ERIN BROCKOVICH. I guess neither RICH IN LOVE nor THE BROWNING VERSION were big enough to merit the Academy's attention, but his work in both those films was infinitely more subtle, and at the same time more commanding, than his role as Julia Roberts' boss in that megahit.
And people ask me why I don't take the Oscars seriously.
June 21, 2005
| Wonderful movie |
Do not expect a stringent story line. This are rather various shots of family life - but well taken. Here, the talks between the father and his younger daughter stick out, especially when the father admits to his daughter that he had never found a way to talk to her as her mother had monopolized her. And he confesses that if she would have been a son it might have been different. But now that the mother was gone he finally came to appreciate having a daughter (in fact he has two).
Younger people might not enjoy the film as they will not (no offence) understand the message of the film.
Also recommendable: the wonderful scenary of the South Carolinian coast area. Wonderful impressions. A film with a lot of emotions.
So, if you are 35 and above, have children and ... buy the film. March 31, 2002
| Wishing There Were an Option for a -100 Star Rating! |
It was a completely disjointed movie that I couldn't figure out. It stands out in my mind as the WORST movie I've ever seen. I left the movie thinking, "What was the purpose?"
When my friends and I speak comparatively about a bad movie, we always ask, "Was it as bad as 'Rich in Love'" or, in jokingly trying to find something good to say about a particularly bad movie, we say, "Well, there's always 'Rich in Love' so it's not the absolute WORST movie in the world."
The only good thing I can say about this movie is that the South Carolina locale is absolutely breath-taking. When a scenery is the best thing you can find to say about a movie... There you have it! February 19, 2001
