Scream 3 (2000)
Facts
| Cast | David Arquette, Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox, Patrick Dempsey, Scott Foley, Lance Henriksen, Matt Keeslar, Jamie Kennedy, Heather Matarazzo, Jenny McCarthy, Emily Mortimer, Parker Posey, Kelly Rutherford, Liev Schreiber, Beth Toussaint and Patrick Warburton |
| Theatrical Release | February 4, 2000 |
| DVD Release | July 4, 2000 |
| Running Time | 117 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | R (Restricted) |
| UPC Code | 717951004895 |
| Buy this item | $7.99 at Amazon.com As of Oct 11 17:05 EDT (details) 1 DVD, Dimension, Usually ships in 24 hours, Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Collector's Edition, Color, Dolby, DVD-Video, Widescreen, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language - Dolby Digital 5.1), English (Subtitled) Or 59 new from $3.67, 66 used from $1.98, 2 collectible from $14.99 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Scream 3 posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| Great Experience |
| The grand conclusion. |
But I loved the conclusion.
The main character has been driven into isolation, the entire cast seems to have moved on with their lives the best they can considering everything that happened.
Until an new killer shows up and drags everyone back into it again.
The acting was good, the direction was good as was the story.
It was cool to see Randy's videotape.
The entire thing wraps up in a very innovative way.
I hope they don't do a fourth one.
Three was enough and I think the Scream trilogy will withstand the test of time.........maybe.
Still, I recommend the entire trilogy.
It puts some new and interesting spins on the tired old horror genre.
June 25, 2008
| A good finish but lacking. |
Now ignoring the fact this is seen that before. Somethings were done right. Such as being a bit more innovative with the killer. But what I didn't like was the "trilogy factor" not being carried out to its full potential. When they played the video to learn what they were dealing with. That one scene had the most impact to me. Too bad it was only introduced.
Scream 3 to me was wasted potential to a certain degree. It had the one element to set itself apart from the first two and failed to deliver. Still, it was a good addition and finish to the series. Although not scary buy any stretch. It is still good entertainment. March 31, 2008
| Good Ending Chapter but Could've Been Better |
And then we come to Scream 3. And Parker Posey. What the hell were they thinking? Parker Posey is in my opinion an atrocious actor in this movie; she's not convincing at all, and yet she's given such a major role! I tell myself that maybe this movie was more meant to be comic relief than the final chapter in a trilogy, and that helps a little. There's another character in this particular movie that tries to be smart but is stupid, and that kinda supports my "it's a comic-relief movie" idea.
All that said, there are some very clever parts to this movie as well. The ending is an awesome surprise because much in the manner of Scream 1 and 2, Scream 3 turns what you thought you know about the killer/killers on its head. Also, even though my favorite character was killed off in Scream 2, they found a perfectly plausible way to get him/ her into Scream 3. And call me morbid if you must, but I LOVE what happens to Parker Posey's character at the end. Also, unlike many other horror movies I've seen, at the end of this one, you really do get the sense that it's over, that there's no more--that the characters that remain can finally live in peace and get on with their lives.
So, overall, I like this movie. I'm afraid Parker Posey's acting/ role negates any ability to rate it above 3 stars (although I could go as high as 3.5 stars if given the option), but it's worth watching if you've never seen it and have seen the first 2. March 15, 2008
| Scream...Laugh...It's Entertaining |
4 Stars because the 3rd just isn't the greatest and left me a little dissapointed, but nothing too major. :) December 2, 2007
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





