Lost in Space (1998)
Facts
| Directed by | Stephen Hopkins |
| Cast | William Hurt, Mimi Rogers, Heather Graham, Lacey Chabert, Jack Johnson (II), Angela Cartwright, Edward Fox, Mark Goddard, Jared Harris, Marta Kristen, Matt Leblanc, June Lockhart, Gary Oldman and John Sharian |
| Theatrical Release | April 3, 1998 |
| DVD Release | October 6, 1998 |
| Running Time | 130 minutes |
| MPAA Rating | PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested) |
| UPC Code | 794043466724 |
| Buy this item ... | 39 new from $3.99, 123 used from $0.99, 6 collectible from $10.00 |
Website Links
- Movie Review Query Engine - Directory of movie reviews.
- IMDb - Features plot summaries, reviews, cast lists, and theatre schedules.
- Art.com - Search for Lost in Space posters.
Similar Movies
User Reviews
Average user review:| AS A BIG SCREEN REMAKE, NOT SO HOT - AS A BIG BUDGET SCI-FI EXTRAVAGANZA - PRETTY GOOD! |
The Amazon reviewer says it all brilliantly. We second their esteemed opinion. A superior DVD of a not-so-bad-movie. Certainly a fun time waster and if you've never seen the original series, you'll probably enjoy it even that much more. The cast is first rate - Oldman gives a finely shaded performance that manages to pay tribute to the original Dr. Smith (Jonathan Harris) without going too far over the top. And how delightful that they brought in the original voice for the Robot.
Give this one a shot. April 12, 2008
| iS THERE A WORD FOR WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU? |
Lost In Space starring William Hurt,et. al. is based on a 1960's TV show. I never really cared much for the TV show, but the movie is kind of interesting. The Robinson Family aboard their starship Jupiter II is bound for another system to construct a hyper-space gate which will allow instantaneous travel or almost instantaneous travel.
A Science Fiction thriller that will provide plenty of entertainment.
Recommended for Science Fiction Fans and fans of 1960 era TV.
Gunner December, 2007
December 20, 2007
| Wow, This was an unexpected Treat : Five Stars |
William Hurt is good in anything, and he was great here as the father who loves his work more than his family. The dialogue, which most people found inane and juvenile, is certainly nothing to write home about, but its servicable. I would say that if they had a better screenwriter the film would have probably done better business all around.
My only 'problem' with this film is the monkey-like alien that they suddenly introduced. They get this off a deserted space station in a hyper universe. The moneky names itself Blarp. Yes, you heard that right. The CGI on this is especially bad as it looks like it belongs in a much different, much less sophisticated film. If the monkey were removed, this would have been an even better film.
Matt LeBlanc was 31 years old when he made this, and he has never looked better either before or since. I was quite surprised that Joey looked 'this good' because frankly looking at him today is a task. The same cannot be said of Heather Graham who has a very weakly written role. Mimi Rogers has the worst lines, as some sort of neglected housewife who just happens to be a pro at interplanetary travel. Whatever. This all worked for me, no matter how convoluted it sounds.
The best way to watch this treat is to leave your brain at the door and take it for what it is. This is a fine slice of sci fi heaven, and definitely better than other more serious films of the genre like 'Red Planet'. And since this DVD is full of features, I'd suggest buying this as soon as you can (it went out of print officially in early 2007 - no idea when its going to be back).
Five Stars. HUGELY entertaining, and I could watch this over and over. October 1, 2007
| Good - Not Great |
| Would have been a good graphic novel |
But then you hear the script spoken aloud and somehow it suddenly hits you how implausable large chunks of the story are and how badly the screenwriter's dialog translates to the screen. Also hindering the whole affair is the near ubiquitous bad acting. The only actors who truly do their jobs well are Gary Oldman and the two children. The film's computer generated space effects are imaginative but the technology of the time simply wasn't as good as model work, which is distracting. Meanwhile, the story plays havoc with physics, which is distracting to people who know anything above average about science, though this reviewer is willing to be forgiving with regards to that, simply because one gets the sense that the screenwriter at least thought he was doing the science justice.
Lost In Space isn't a bad movie and its not quite a good movie. So get some nachos, take it for what it is, and enjoy. September 15, 2007
More reviews at Amazon.com ...





